ASA - Revision history

imported>Doug Williamson: Mend link.

2022-06-25T19:55:23Z

Mend link.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 25 June 2022
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*[[Internal Models Approach]]		*[[Internal Models Approach]]
	*[[Operational risk]]		*[[Operational risk]]
	*[[~~TSA~~]]		*[[Standardised Approach]] (SA or TSA)

	[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]		[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]

imported>Doug Williamson: Classify page.

2022-06-25T19:53:45Z

Classify page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 25 June 2022
Line 28:		Line 28:
	*[[Operational risk]]		*[[Operational risk]]
	*[[TSA]]		*[[TSA]]

			[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
			[[Category:The_business_context]]
			[[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]]
			[[Category:Manage_risks]]
			[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]
			[[Category:Risk_reporting]]
			[[Category:Financial_products_and_markets]]

imported>Doug Williamson: Expand. Source: linked pages.

2016-10-29T12:14:54Z

Expand. Source: linked pages.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 29 October 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:


	Under the alternative standardised approach, the nominal amount of loans and advances is multiplied by a fixed percentage to calculate the measure of risk weighted assets.		Under the alternative standardised approach, the nominal amount of loans and advances is multiplied by a fixed percentage to calculate the measure of risk weighted assets (RWAs).

	For example:		For example:
Line 15:		Line 15:

	£1,000m x 3.5% = £35m		£1,000m x 3.5% = £35m


			RWAs for other business lines are determined in the same way as under the standardised approach (TSA).

imported>Doug Williamson: Update.

2016-10-29T11:35:17Z

Update.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:35, 29 October 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The Alternative Standardised Approach is a method of evaluation of certain operational risks, for capital adequacy calculation purposes.		The Alternative Standardised Approach is a method of evaluation of certain operational risks, for capital adequacy calculation purposes.

	The ASA may be used by certain banks whose business is predominantly retail and commercial banking.		The ASA may be used by certain banks whose business is predominantly retail and commercial banking, in relation to their loans and advances.

imported>Doug Williamson: Expand.

2016-10-29T11:33:56Z

Expand.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 29 October 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Alternative Standardised Approach.		Alternative Standardised Approach.

	The Alternative Standardised Approach is a method of evaluation of certain operational risks ~~for banks~~, for capital adequacy calculation purposes.		The Alternative Standardised Approach is a method of evaluation of certain operational risks, for capital adequacy calculation purposes.

			The ASA may be used by certain banks whose business is predominantly retail and commercial banking.


			Under the alternative standardised approach, the nominal amount of loans and advances is multiplied by a fixed percentage to calculate the measure of risk weighted assets.

			For example:

			Nominal amount x 3.5% = RWAs

			£1,000m x 3.5% = £35m

imported>Doug Williamson: Create the page. Source: PRA http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/pra/Documents/publications/sop/2015/p2methodologies.pdf

2016-08-18T17:40:23Z

Create the page. Source: PRA http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/pra/Documents/publications/sop/2015/p2methodologies.pdf

New page

''Bank supervision - capital adequacy - operational risk.''

Alternative Standardised Approach.

The Alternative Standardised Approach is a method of evaluation of certain operational risks for banks, for capital adequacy calculation purposes.

==See also==
*[[AMA]]
*[[Bank supervision]]
*[[BIA]]
*[[Capital adequacy]]
*[[Internal Models Approach]]
*[[Operational risk]]
*[[TSA]]