Stability - Revision history

Doug: Add link.

2024-11-05T03:55:04Z

Add link.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 5 November 2024
Line 32:		Line 32:
	* [[Stress]]		* [[Stress]]
	* [[Term out]]		* [[Term out]]
			* [[Volatile]]
	* [[Volatility]]		* [[Volatility]]

	[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]		[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
	[[Category:The_business_context]]		[[Category:The_business_context]]

2022-07-02T11:34:22Z

Classify page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:34, 2 July 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:


	2.		2. ''Pensions funding.''

	''Pensions funding.''

	A pensions funding method is considered stable if it is not greatly affected by fluctuations in experience.		A pensions funding method is considered stable if it is not greatly affected by fluctuations in experience.


	3.		3. ''Bank funding.''

	''Bank funding.''

	Sources of bank funding are considered stable if they can be depended on to remain as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress.		Sources of bank funding are considered stable if they can be depended on to remain as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress.
Line 37:		Line 33:
	* [[Term out]]		* [[Term out]]
	* [[Volatility]]		* [[Volatility]]

			[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
			[[Category:The_business_context]]

2018-08-02T17:01:26Z

Link with High Council for Financial Stability page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 2 August 2018
Line 26:		Line 26:
	* [[Flighty]]		* [[Flighty]]
	* [[Funding]]		* [[Funding]]
			* [[High Council for Financial Stability]]
	* [[Leverage]]		* [[Leverage]]
	* [[Maturity transformation]]		* [[Maturity transformation]]

2017-10-01T17:01:15Z

Link with Run rate page.

2016-11-12T17:18:39Z

Add link.

2016-10-30T19:58:14Z

Add link.

2016-08-10T19:39:05Z

Add link.

2016-08-10T17:35:17Z

Amend link.

2016-08-10T17:28:19Z

Add links.

2016-08-09T17:00:45Z

Layout.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 9 August 2016
Line 18:		Line 18:

	For example, deposits by retail customers within the size limits of relevant deposit guarantee schemes are considered relatively more stable, compared with larger and professionally managed deposits.		For example, deposits by retail customers within the size limits of relevant deposit guarantee schemes are considered relatively more stable, compared with larger and professionally managed deposits.