Straight line: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Standardise appearance of page)
imported>Doug Williamson
(Standardise calculs)
Line 13: Line 13:




The total expected accounting cost:  
The total expected accounting cost, in $m:  


= $12m - $2m
= 12 - 2


= $10m.
= 10




Allocated on a straight line basis over 4 years, the depreciation charge in each year would be:  
Allocated on a straight line basis over 4 years, the depreciation charge in each year, in $m, would be:  


= $10m / 4  
= 10 / 4  


= $2.5m.
= 2.5




The net book value of the fixed asset would be (at the end of each year):
The net book value of the fixed asset in $m would be in each successive year:


Year 1:  
Year 1:  
Line 33: Line 33:
= 12.0 - 2.5  
= 12.0 - 2.5  


= $9.5m.
= 9.5




Line 40: Line 40:
= 9.5 - 2.5  
= 9.5 - 2.5  


= $7.0m.
= 7.0




Line 47: Line 47:
= 7.0 - 2.5  
= 7.0 - 2.5  


= $4.5m.
= 4.5




Line 54: Line 54:
= 4.5 - 2.5  
= 4.5 - 2.5  


= $2.0m.
= 2.0





Revision as of 15:25, 18 March 2015

1.

A basis of allocating total costs or income equally across successive time periods.


Example

A fixed asset has a cost of $12m,

an expected disposal value of $2m,

and an expected useful life of 4 years.


The total expected accounting cost, in $m:

= 12 - 2

= 10


Allocated on a straight line basis over 4 years, the depreciation charge in each year, in $m, would be:

= 10 / 4

= 2.5


The net book value of the fixed asset in $m would be in each successive year:

Year 1:

= 12.0 - 2.5

= 9.5


Year 2:

= 9.5 - 2.5

= 7.0


Year 3:

= 7.0 - 2.5

= 4.5


Year 4:

= 4.5 - 2.5

= 2.0


Using a straight line basis of depreciation, the net book value of a retained asset will often fall to zero. (But it would never be depreciated to a negative value of course.)


2.

An estimation method which assumes a straight line relationship between the items under review.

Sometimes known as Linear interpolation.


See also