Letter of comfort and Probability: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(ACT Website link added 1/10/13 & spelling correction in definition)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Layout.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A formal letter written to a lender, normally by a parent company, indicating a willingness by the parent to accept some responsibility to honour the borrowing obligations of, or to otherwise support, a subsidiary or associated company, but without necessarily constituting a legal obligation to do so.
The study of chance providing an objective measure of uncertainty.




== ACT Website links ==
Probabilities range between 1 (=100%) and 0 (=0%). 


[http://www.treasurers.org/lettersofcomfort A Practical Guide to Letters of Comfort, 25 September 2013]
A probability of 100% means that an event is considered certain to occur.  
 
A probability of 0% means that an event is considered certain not to occur. 
 
 
For example, flipping an unbiased coin, the probability of getting a head is often modelled as 50%.
 
 
This simple model of a coin flip assumes that the only two possibilities are a head or a tail.  Applying such simple models to financial situations, and treating financial outcomes as simple coin flips, may lead to errors resulting from:
 
#The coin landing on its edge 'more often than it's supposed to'.
#The underlying assumption of an unbiased coin not being a valid one. This kind of assumption is usually much too simple.




== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Letter of awareness]]
* [[Black swan]]
* [[Parent company]]
* [[Conditional probability]]
* [[Confidence interval]]
* [[Frequency distribution]]
* [[Mutually exclusive]]
* [[Poisson distribution]]

Revision as of 15:19, 8 June 2016

The study of chance providing an objective measure of uncertainty.


Probabilities range between 1 (=100%) and 0 (=0%).

A probability of 100% means that an event is considered certain to occur.

A probability of 0% means that an event is considered certain not to occur.


For example, flipping an unbiased coin, the probability of getting a head is often modelled as 50%.


This simple model of a coin flip assumes that the only two possibilities are a head or a tail. Applying such simple models to financial situations, and treating financial outcomes as simple coin flips, may lead to errors resulting from:

  1. The coin landing on its edge 'more often than it's supposed to'.
  2. The underlying assumption of an unbiased coin not being a valid one. This kind of assumption is usually much too simple.


See also