Discounted cash flow and Mid-sized companies: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Add heading.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Make verb into 'turn over' and add apostrophe in firm's.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''Investment appraisal.''
Smaller, large companies.


(DCF).  
Often firms are classified as small, medium or large. Different definitions of the categories apply for different purposes, in different jurisdictions and in formal and informal use.


Discounted cash flow is a process of discounting cash flows that are expected in the future, to make them comparable in value with each other and with cash flows received today.
A common grouping is [[Small and Medium-sized Enterprises]] (SMEs). They may benefit from easier financial reporting requirements, tax provisions or eligibility for various government-provided support.


Most firms are small, some are medium-sized and few are large. But the size of firms in the large category vary greatly. It has become useful to distinguish smaller large companies for some purposes.


The DCF process is widely used in investment appraisal, where the rate used to discount with is a measure of the appropriately risk-adjusted cost of capital.
For example, in European Union usage, SMEs do not exceed €43m in turnover while large companies turn over many billions. Opportunities of many kinds vary materially with a firm's size, for example, the available range of investment and financing opportunities.


Where the sum of discounted future positive cash flows (inflows) is calculated, this is often referred to as the total ''Present value'' of those cash flows.
In the UK, the idea of Mid-sized companies, with turnover of up to £500m and of Mid-sized companies with up to £1bn turnover has developed. By early 2015 the idea of mid-size has been taken up by some authors in euro-terms as a broad Mid-sized company range up to €1.2bn turnover.


Where the present value of future expected cash flows is netted against discounted investment outflows, this is referred to as the ''Net present value'' of the investment proposal.
No doubt terminology will continue to develop until its use in law and regulation makes further change more difficult or confusing.


 
[[Category:The_business_context]]
Discounted cash flow techniques include Net Present Value (NPV) analysis and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) analysis.
 
 
== See also ==
* [[Cost of capital]]
* [[Discount rate]]
* [[Discounting]]
* [[Incremental cash flows]]
* [[Internal rate of return]]
* [[Investment appraisal]]
* [[Net present value]]
* [[Present value]]
* [[Time value of money]]
 
 
===Other links===
[http://www.treasurers.org/node/8445 Masterclass: Discounted cash flow, ''Will Spinney'', The Treasurer]
 
[[Category:Corporate_finance]]

Revision as of 19:46, 6 April 2015

Smaller, large companies.

Often firms are classified as small, medium or large. Different definitions of the categories apply for different purposes, in different jurisdictions and in formal and informal use.

A common grouping is Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). They may benefit from easier financial reporting requirements, tax provisions or eligibility for various government-provided support.

Most firms are small, some are medium-sized and few are large. But the size of firms in the large category vary greatly. It has become useful to distinguish smaller large companies for some purposes.

For example, in European Union usage, SMEs do not exceed €43m in turnover while large companies turn over many billions. Opportunities of many kinds vary materially with a firm's size, for example, the available range of investment and financing opportunities.

In the UK, the idea of Mid-sized companies, with turnover of up to £500m and of Mid-sized companies with up to £1bn turnover has developed. By early 2015 the idea of mid-size has been taken up by some authors in euro-terms as a broad Mid-sized company range up to €1.2bn turnover.

No doubt terminology will continue to develop until its use in law and regulation makes further change more difficult or confusing.