Systematic internaliser and TBTF: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Link with Broker crossing network page.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Align with Glossary.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
(SI).
Too Big To Fail.
 
The concept of Systematic internalisers was introduced by [[MiFID]] regulations in 2007.
 
SIs are institutions large enough to match client orders internally, or against their own books.
 
SIs differ from broker crossing networks, which may route client orders between a number of different institutions.
 
 
An SI is defined in MiFID as:
 
#An investment firm which
#On an organised, frequent and systematic basis,
#Deals on own account by executing client orders outside a [[regulated market]] (RM) or an MTF ([[Multilateral trading facility]]).
 
 
A firm does not need specific authorisation from its competent authority to carry out systematic internalisation.
 
However, similarly to MTFs and RMs, they are required to conform to some transparency requirements,
such as providing public price quotes.
 
 
Only a few (generally large) firms have set up SIs.
 
 


== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[MiFID]]
* [[Too Big To Fail]]
*[[Regulated market]]
*[[Multilateral trading facility]]
*[[Broker crossing network]]
 
[[Category:Equity]]
[[Category:Regulation_and_Law]]
[[Category:FX_Risk]]

Revision as of 11:42, 30 May 2013

Too Big To Fail.

See also