Mentor and Provision of information: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Distinguish mentor from coach.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Added internal explanation of Chinese walls)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
1.
A provision of information covenant requires the borrower to provide information to enable the lender to monitor the borrower’s credit risk.  


An independent experienced person in an organisation who advises and supports less experienced employees, sometimes known as 'mentees'.
Such information routinely includes copies of published financial information and circulars to shareholders. It is unlikely that treasurers will see any problem with this.


The mentor is normally experienced in the mentee's professional specialism.


Ideally from a corporate borrower's perspective, the borrower would only provide published information, but weaker credits are unlikely to be able to negotiate this. Generally the level of information required increases as the credit quality of the borrower falls, and can include budgets, forecasts and management accounts.


2.
Problems may arise when the borrower is a quoted company and the information sought is unpublished and therefore possibly price sensitive, especially if the lender is a universal bank conducting both lending and share dealing activities. Even though most banks will have internal 'Chinese walls' (barriers designed to prevent transfer of confidential information between departments), treasurers may wish to obtain additional confidentiality undertakings bearing in mind regulatory requirements imposing a ‘continuing obligation’ of the avoidance of a false market.


A similarly independent person employed by a different organisation from the mentee.


Where non-bank lenders are involved in bank type lending arrangements, this issue of confidentiality becomes more extreme. While banks have established procedures for keeping information separate from different areas, non-banks do not have this sophistication. One solution is to restrict information to certain lenders to only published data and indeed some presentations are managed in two parts to deal with this.


==See also==
*[[Association of Corporate Treasurers]]
*[[Coach]]
*[[USP]]
*[[Working effectively with others]]


 
== See also ==
==Other links==
* [[Covenant]]
=====The ACT's Mentor Me scheme=====
* [[Financial covenant]]
The ACT runs a mentoring matching service for its members and students.
* [[Negative pledge]]
 
* [[Non-financial covenant]]
[https://www.treasurers.org/cpd/mentoring Mentor Me]
 
[[Category:Self_management_and_accountability]]
[[Category:Working_effectively_with_others]]

Revision as of 15:40, 1 August 2015

A provision of information covenant requires the borrower to provide information to enable the lender to monitor the borrower’s credit risk.

Such information routinely includes copies of published financial information and circulars to shareholders. It is unlikely that treasurers will see any problem with this.


Ideally from a corporate borrower's perspective, the borrower would only provide published information, but weaker credits are unlikely to be able to negotiate this. Generally the level of information required increases as the credit quality of the borrower falls, and can include budgets, forecasts and management accounts.

Problems may arise when the borrower is a quoted company and the information sought is unpublished and therefore possibly price sensitive, especially if the lender is a universal bank conducting both lending and share dealing activities. Even though most banks will have internal 'Chinese walls' (barriers designed to prevent transfer of confidential information between departments), treasurers may wish to obtain additional confidentiality undertakings bearing in mind regulatory requirements imposing a ‘continuing obligation’ of the avoidance of a false market.


Where non-bank lenders are involved in bank type lending arrangements, this issue of confidentiality becomes more extreme. While banks have established procedures for keeping information separate from different areas, non-banks do not have this sophistication. One solution is to restrict information to certain lenders to only published data and indeed some presentations are managed in two parts to deal with this.


See also