Fractal markets hypothesis and Non-financial risk: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Remove broken link.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Add link.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
(FMH).
''Risk management - banking - financial firms.''


The fractal markets hypothesis is an evolving model of investor and market behaviour which identifies repeating patterns in market prices and conditions.
(NFR).


The FMH may explain why extreme negative (and positive) outturns are observed more frequently in real financial markets than predicted by simpler efficient market models.
Non-financial risks are all risks that are not financial risks.


The concept is particularly important for banks and other financial firms where, historically, the management of non-financial risks may in some cases have been neglected.


Under the FMH, a key contributory factor is the difference in investment time horizons between different classes of market participants.


:<span style="color:#4B0082">'''''Only a downside'''''</span>


If the FMH is borne out in practice, then real financial markets are significantly less stable than predicted and described by more traditional market models.
:"Non-financial risk, whether related to misconduct, non-compliance, IT, reputational, cybersecurity or operational challenges, is not linked directly to financial decisions and has only a downside.  


:In other words, unlike credit or market risk, here there are only potential losses, which can be large. In addition, non-financial risk can only be reduced or mitigated, but not eliminated, and it is far more difficult to quantify than financial risks.
:Despite all these difficulties, or perhaps because of them, non-financial risk has been on [bank] regulators’ and supervisors’ radar for quite some time. In fact, it’s been more than 15 years since the Basel II capital accord included a capital charge for operational risk."
:''Margarita Delgado, Deputy Governor, Banco de Espana, 2019''




== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Compliance risk]]
* [[Conduct risk]]
* [[Credit risk]]
* [[Cyberrisk]]
* [[Downside risk]]
* [[Financial]]
* [[Financial risk]]
* [[Guide to risk management]]
* [[Market risk]]
* [[Operational risk]]
* [[Regulatory risk]]
* [[Reputational risk]]
* [[Risk]]
* [[Risk management]]
* [[Risk mitigation]]
* [[Systemic risk]]


[[Efficient market hypothesis]]
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
[[Behavioural economics]]
[[Category:The_business_context]]
[[Market risk]]
[[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]]
 
[[Category:Manage_risks]]
[[Category:Corporate_financial_management]]
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]
[[Category:Financial_risk_management]]
[[Category:Risk_reporting]]

Latest revision as of 22:46, 11 March 2023

Risk management - banking - financial firms.

(NFR).

Non-financial risks are all risks that are not financial risks.

The concept is particularly important for banks and other financial firms where, historically, the management of non-financial risks may in some cases have been neglected.


Only a downside
"Non-financial risk, whether related to misconduct, non-compliance, IT, reputational, cybersecurity or operational challenges, is not linked directly to financial decisions and has only a downside.
In other words, unlike credit or market risk, here there are only potential losses, which can be large. In addition, non-financial risk can only be reduced or mitigated, but not eliminated, and it is far more difficult to quantify than financial risks.
Despite all these difficulties, or perhaps because of them, non-financial risk has been on [bank] regulators’ and supervisors’ radar for quite some time. In fact, it’s been more than 15 years since the Basel II capital accord included a capital charge for operational risk."
Margarita Delgado, Deputy Governor, Banco de Espana, 2019


See also