Meme and Payment for Order Flow: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create page. Sources - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme)
 
imported>John Grout
(To create the entry)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''Behaviour - behavioural economics.''
PFOF


1.
Payment for order flow is defined by the UK [[Financial Conduct Authority]] in FG12/13 [http://www.fca.org.uk/your-fca/documents/finalised-guidance/fsa-fg1213], origibnally issued by the [[FSA]], as an arrangement whereby a [[broker]] receives payment from [[market maker]]s, in exchange for sending order flow to them.


Originally, a feature of culture or behaviour passed between individuals and groups without the influence of genes and heredity.
The FCA sees such arrangements (whatever called) as creating potential conflict of interest and pressing against best execution of orders for clients and, accordingly, compromising observation of its best execution rule.


The word "meme" derives from the Greek word ''mimema'', meaning "imitated thing".  It was coined and popularised by Richard Dawkins in ''The Selfish Gene'' (1976).
More generally in the European Union, such payments may fall foul of the EU's [[MiFID]] rules on "inducements" reflected in the FCA's Handbook ([[http://fshandbook.info/FS/html/FCA/COBS/2/3]] at 2.3.1).
 
 
2.  ''Information technology - internet.''
 
By extension, an idea, image or phrase spread rapidly over the internet.
 
(Also known as an ''internet meme''.)
 
 
== See also ==
* [[Behavioural economics]]
* [[Herd behaviour]]
* [[Information technology]]
* [[Internet]]
* [[Meme stock]]
 
[[Category:The_business_context]]
[[Category:Technology]]

Revision as of 10:29, 31 July 2014

PFOF

Payment for order flow is defined by the UK Financial Conduct Authority in FG12/13 [1], origibnally issued by the FSA, as an arrangement whereby a broker receives payment from market makers, in exchange for sending order flow to them.

The FCA sees such arrangements (whatever called) as creating potential conflict of interest and pressing against best execution of orders for clients and, accordingly, compromising observation of its best execution rule.

More generally in the European Union, such payments may fall foul of the EU's MiFID rules on "inducements" reflected in the FCA's Handbook ([[2]] at 2.3.1).