Net asset value and Net present value: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Add alternative names.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Standardise calculation presentation.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
(NAV).  
(NPV).  


1.
1.


A method of valuing a business which is based on the sum of the values of each of its assets, less its total liabilities.
The total [[present value]] of all of the cash flows of a proposal - both positive and negative - netting off negative present values against positive ones.  


The current balance sheet of the business would normally be the starting point for a net asset valuation.
For example, the expected future cash inflows from an investment project LESS the initial capital investment outflow at Time 0.


The (starting) book values of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet are then appropriately adjusted to reflect relevant current market values.


Further adjustments are then made for the addition of any other relevant assets and liabilities (not reflected in the starting balance sheet).
<span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example'''</span>


A project requires an investment today of $100m, with $120m being receivable one year from now.


2. ''Investment funds - money market funds.''
The cost of capital (r) is 10% per annum.


The market price of an investment fund’s portfolio of securities (after the deduction of debt to be repaid) calculated by dividing the total value with the total volume of the fund's securities in issue.


The NPV of the project is calculated as follows:


3.


Similar valuation methods applied to other entities.
PV of Time 0 outflow $100m
 
= $(100m)
 
 
PV of Time 1 inflow $120m
 
= $120m x 1.1<sup>-1</sup>
 
= $109.09m
 
 
NPV = -$100m + $109.09m
 
= +$9.09m
 
 
 
2.
 
In simple ''Net Present Value analysis'' the decision rule would be that:
 
(1) All positive NPV opportunities should be accepted.
 
(2) All negative NPV opportunities should be rejected. 
 
 
So the project in the example above would be accepted - on this basis - because its NPV is positive, namely +$9.09m.
 
 
However this assumes the unlimited availability of further capital with no increase in the cost of capital.
 
A more refined decision rule is that:
 
(1) All negative NPV opportunities should still be rejected; while
 
(2) All positive NPV opportunities remain eligible for further consideration (rather than automatically being accepted).




== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Accumulating net asset value]]
* [[Capital rationing]]
* [[Book value]]
* [[CertFMM]]
* [[Constant net asset value]] = stable net asset value
* [[Discounted cash flow]]
* [[Going concern]]
* [[Economic value added]]
* [[Gone concern]]
* [[Internal rate of return]]
* [[Investment trust]]
* [[Investment appraisal]]
* [[Investment fund]]
* [[Present value]]
* [[Low-volatility NAV]]
* [[Residual theory]]
* [[Money market fund]]
* [[Weighted average cost of capital]]
* [[Net]]
* [[Net assets]]
* [[Net asset valuation]]
* [[Security]]
* [[Tangible net worth]]
* [[Variable net asset value]] = floating net asset value
 
[[Category:Investment]]

Revision as of 15:35, 2 March 2016

(NPV).

1.

The total present value of all of the cash flows of a proposal - both positive and negative - netting off negative present values against positive ones.

For example, the expected future cash inflows from an investment project LESS the initial capital investment outflow at Time 0.


Example

A project requires an investment today of $100m, with $120m being receivable one year from now.

The cost of capital (r) is 10% per annum.


The NPV of the project is calculated as follows:


PV of Time 0 outflow $100m

= $(100m)


PV of Time 1 inflow $120m

= $120m x 1.1-1

= $109.09m


NPV = -$100m + $109.09m

= +$9.09m


2.

In simple Net Present Value analysis the decision rule would be that:

(1) All positive NPV opportunities should be accepted.

(2) All negative NPV opportunities should be rejected.


So the project in the example above would be accepted - on this basis - because its NPV is positive, namely +$9.09m.


However this assumes the unlimited availability of further capital with no increase in the cost of capital.

A more refined decision rule is that:

(1) All negative NPV opportunities should still be rejected; while

(2) All positive NPV opportunities remain eligible for further consideration (rather than automatically being accepted).


See also