Unrewarded risk

From ACT Wiki
Revision as of 12:41, 4 September 2014 by imported>Doug Williamson (Improve wording to align with ACT course materials MCT 4.1.3, 1 April 2012, p13.)
Jump to navigationJump to search

An unrewarded risk is one which is not directly associated with any benefit for the party accepting the risk.

So it is never rational - in terms of profit maximisation - to accept an unrewarded risk if it can be avoided.


The concept of rewarded and unrewarded risks can be a very useful way to analyse risks, as it can indicate whether a particular risk is a legitimate business risk (and therefore consistent with the business strategy) or not.

An example of a rewarded risk is a business investment decision, such as an acquisition or the purchase of a new machine, launch of a new product and so on. Such an investment will be made because there is a reasonable expectation of a return, and hence ultimately an expectation of an increase in shareholder wealth.


Examples of unrewarded risk are operational risks such as the risks of systems failure, fire or theft, all of which may be costly to manage, and for which there is no direct return for taking.

Clearly risk which is unrewarded is best avoided where there is no cost to doing so.


However, many unrewarded risks, such as fire and theft, are inevitable in business, and must be managed as cost-effectively as possible.

The cost of managing unrewarded risks must be covered by (and thus erodes) the returns earned from rewarded risks.


See also