De jure and De minimis: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Mend link.)
 
imported>Administrator
(CSV import)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''Law - company law - regulation''.
A legal term implying that a matter is trivial and it is not appropriate to pursue it.
 
Existing as a legal right or restriction, whether or not borne out as a matter of practical reality.
 
The opposite of de facto.
 
 
:<span style="color:#4B0082">'''''De facto capital market integration exceeds de jure'''''</span>
 
:"[There is a] substantial gap between de facto and de jure measures of financial openness and integration.
 
:In short, the fact that numerous developing countries impose significant legal controls on the international movement of capital does not mean that such controls are particularly effective in curbing international capital flows.
 
:Actual financial integration – as measured by capital flows and cross-border financial asset holdings – may significantly exceed the level implied by corresponding legal controls."
 
:''Asian capital market integration - the Treasurer's Wiki''
 


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Asian capital market integration: theory and evidence]]
* [[De maximis]]
* [[Capital control]]
* [[De minimis exempt tax]]
* [[De facto ]]


[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
[[Category:The_business_context]]

Revision as of 14:19, 23 October 2012

A legal term implying that a matter is trivial and it is not appropriate to pursue it.

See also