imported>Doug Williamson |
imported>Doug Williamson |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| The zero coupon rate is also known as the [[zero coupon yield]], spot rate, or spot yield.
| | A European Union proposal for a regulation to stop the largest banks from engaging in proprietary trading (comparable with the Volcker Rule in the US Dodd-Frank Act). |
|
| |
|
| | The proposals for the EU would also give supervisors the power to require those banks to separate certain potentially risky trading activities from their deposit-taking business, if the pursuit of such activities was deemed to compromise financial stability. |
|
| |
|
| '''Conversion'''
| |
|
| |
|
| If we know the zero coupon rates (yield curve) for a given risk class and set of maturities, we can calculate both the [[forward yield]]s and the [[par yield]]s for the same maturities and risk class.
| | The proposals are also known as the 'Liikanen rule' or the Barnier-Liikanen rule. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| The conversion process and calculation stems from the '[[no-arbitrage]]' relationship between the related yield curves.
| |
|
| |
|
| This means - for example - that the total cumulative cash flows from a two-year investment must be identical, whether the investment is built:
| | ==See also== |
| | | *[[Dodd-Frank]] |
| * '[[Outright]]' from a two-year zero coupon investment
| | *[[European Union]] |
| * Or as a [[synthetic]] deposit built using a forward contract, reinvesting intermediate principal and interest proceeds at a pre-agreed rate
| | *[[Volcker Rule]] |
| * Or using a par investment, reinvesting intermediate interest to generate a total terminal cash flow
| |
| | |
| | |
| <span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 1: Converting from one and two-period zero coupon yields to forward yields'''</span>
| |
| | |
| Periodic zero coupon yields ('''z''') are:
| |
| | |
| z<sub>0-1</sub> = 0.02 per period (2%)
| |
| | |
| z<sub>0-2</sub> = 0.029951 per period (2.9951%)
| |
| | |
| | |
| The cash returned at Time 2 periods in the future, from investing £1m at Time 0 in a zero coupon instrument at a rate of 2.9951% per period, is:
| |
| | |
| £1m x 1.029951<sup>2</sup>
| |
| | |
| = £'''1.0608'''m
| |
| | |
| | |
| Under no-arbitrage pricing conditions, the identical terminal cash flow of £1.0608m results from investing in an outright zero coupon investment of one period's maturity, together with a forward contract for the second period - for reinvestment at the forward market yield of '''f<sub>1-2</sub>''' per period, as follows:
| |
| | |
| £1m x (1 + z<sub>0-1</sub>) x (1 + f<sub>1-2</sub>) = £'''1.0608'''m
| |
| | |
| | |
| Using this information, we can now calculate the forward yield for 1-2 periods' maturity.
| |
| | |
| 1.02 x (1 + f<sub>1-2</sub>) = 1.0608
| |
| | |
| 1 + f<sub>1-2</sub> = 1.0608 / 1.02
| |
| | |
| f<sub>1-2</sub> = (1.0608 / 1.02) - 1
| |
| | |
| = 1.04 - 1
| |
| | |
| = '''0.04''' per period (= 4%)
| |
| | |
| | |
| This is the market forward rate which we would enjoy if we were to pre-agree today, to make a one-period deposit, committing ourselves to put our money into the deposit one period in the future.
| |
| | |
| | |
| '''Is the terminal cash the same in each case?'''
| |
| | |
| The no-arbitrage relationship says that making such a synthetic deposit should produce the identical terminal cash flow of £1.0608m.
| |
| | |
| Let's see if that's borne out by our calculations.
| |
| | |
| | |
| Investing the same £1m in this synthetic two-periods maturity zero coupon instrument would return:
| |
| | |
| After one period: £1m x 1.02 = £1.02m
| |
| | |
| Reinvested for the second period at the pre-agreed rate of 0.04 per period for one more period:
| |
| | |
| = £1.02m x 1.04
| |
| | |
| = £'''1.0608'''m
| |
| | |
| | |
| ''This is indeed the same result as enjoyed from the outright zero coupon investment, as expected.
| |
| | |
| | |
| (The one period forward rate f<sub>0-1</sub> represents the identical deal to the one period zero coupon rate z<sub>0-1</sub>. For this reason the rate is also identical = 2% per period.)
| |
| | |
| | |
| <span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 2: Converting from zero coupon rates to par rates'''</span>
| |
| | |
| Again using the given zero coupon rates ('''z'''), the par rates ('''p''') can also be calculated.
| |
| | |
| | |
| The periodic zero coupon yields ('''z''') are:
| |
| | |
| z<sub>0-1</sub> = 0.02 per period (2%)
| |
| | |
| z<sub>0-2</sub> = 0.029951 per period (2.9951%)
| |
| | |
| | |
| The no-arbitrage relationship between par rates and zero coupon rates is summarised in the formula:
| |
| | |
| p<sub>0-n</sub> = (1 - DF<sub>n</sub>) / CumDF<sub>n</sub>
| |
| | |
| | |
| ''Where:''
| |
| | |
| p<sub>0-n</sub> = the par rate for maturity n periods, starting now
| |
| | |
| DF<sub>n</sub> = the discount factor for 'n' periods maturity, calculated from the zero coupon rate (z<sub>n</sub>)
| |
| | |
| CumDF<sub>n</sub> = the total of the discount factors for maturities 1 to 'n' periods maturity, again calculated from the zero coupon rates (z<sub>1</sub> to z<sub>n</sub>)
| |
| | |
| | |
| ''Applying the formula:''
| |
| | |
| p<sub>0-2</sub> = (1 - DF<sub>2</sub>) / CumDF<sub>2</sub>
| |
| | |
| p<sub>0-2</sub> = (1 - 1.029951<sup>-2</sup>) / (1.02<sup>-1</sup> + 1.029951<sup>-2</sup>)
| |
| | |
| = 0.029803 (= 2.9803% per period)
| |
| | |
| | |
| This is the theoretical fair (no-arbitrage) market price for the par instrument.
| |
| | |
| It is the calculated rate of interest payable on a two-period investment on par rate terms. This means that 2.9803% interest will be paid on the amount of the original investment, at Times 1 and 2 periods. In addition, the original investment will be repaid at Time 2.
| |
| | |
| | |
| (The one period par rate p<sub>0-1</sub> represents the identical deal to the one period zero coupon rate z<sub>0-1</sub>. For this reason the rate is also identical = 2% per period.)
| |
| | |
| | |
| '''Terminal cash is the same'''
| |
| | |
| In theory, an investment of £1m in a par instrument should produce the same terminal cash flow as a zero coupon instrument or forward instruments. On these figures (forward rates of 2% and 4% for 0-1 and 1-2 periods maturity, respectively) we saw that was £1.0608m for an original investment of £1m.
| |
| | |
| Let's see if it's the same for the par instrument, assuming we arrange for the re-investment of any intermediate cash flows at today's forward rates.
| |
| | |
| | |
| Cash flows from the two period par instrument, paying periodic interest of 2.9803% per period, assuming an initial investment of £1m:
| |
| | |
| | |
| Interest coupon at Time 1 period = £1m x 0.029803 = £<u>0.029803</u>m
| |
| | |
| Principal + interest at Time 2 periods = £1m + 0.029803m = £'''1.029803'''m
| |
| | |
| | |
| The coupon receivable at Time 1 period is reinvested at the pre-agreed forward rate of 4% (0.04) for the maturity 1-2 periods.
| |
| | |
| So the Time 2 proceeds from the reinvested coupon received at Time 1 are:
| |
| | |
| £0.029803 x 1.04
| |
| | |
| = £'''0.030995'''m at Time 2
| |
| | |
| | |
| The total terminal value at Time 2 periods is:
| |
| | |
| 0.030995 + 1.029803
| |
| | |
| = £'''1.0608'''m (as before)
| |
| | |
| | |
| The par rate we have calculated is indeed consistent with the no-arbitrage pricing relationship.
| |
| | |
| | |
| '''Present value is also the same'''
| |
| | |
| No-arbitrage pricing also says that the present value of the par instrument should be the same as the present value of the zero coupon and forward instruments.
| |
| | |
| Present values are calculated from discount factors based on the periodic zero coupon rates.
| |
| | |
| | |
| Continuing with our examples above, the zero coupon rates are:
| |
| | |
| 0-1 period: 0.02 (2%) per period
| |
| | |
| 0-2 periods: 0.029951 (2.9951%) per period
| |
| | |
| | |
| The related discount factors are:
| |
| | |
| 1 period: 1.02<sup>-1</sup>
| |
| | |
| 2 periods: 1.029951<sup>-2</sup>
| |
| | |
| | |
| The cash flows from the zero coupon instrument and the forward instrument are a cash inflow of £1.0608m at Time 2 periods.
| |
| | |
| The present value is:
| |
| | |
| £1.0608m x 1.029951<sup>-2</sup>
| |
| | |
| = £'''1.0000'''m
| |
| | |
| | |
| <span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 3: A par bond trades at par'''</span>
| |
| | |
| A two-period par instrument pays periodic coupons of 2.9803%.
| |
| | |
| Prove that a £1m face value bond has a total present value of par (£1m), using the figures above.
| |
| | |
| | |
| ''Solution''
| |
| | |
| Cash flows from the two period par instrument, paying periodic interest of 2.9803% per period, with a face value of £1m:
| |
| | |
| | |
| Coupon at Time 1 period = £1m x 0.029803 = £<u>0.029803</u>m
| |
| | |
| Principal + coupon at Time 2 periods = £1m + 0.029803m = £'''1.029803'''m
| |
| | |
| | |
| The present values of these cash flows are:
| |
| | |
| Time 1: £0.029803 x 1.02<sup>-1</sup> = 0.02922
| |
| | |
| Time 2: £1.029803 x 1.029951<sup>-2</sup> = 0.97078
| |
| | |
| Total = £'''1.0000'''m
| |
| | |
| | |
| The 'par bond' trades at par, as expected.
| |
| | |
| The pricing is consistent with no aribtrage pricing conditions.
| |
| | |
| | |
| == See also == | |
| * [[Zero coupon yield]] | |
| * [[Forward yield]]
| |
| * [[Converting from forward rates]] | |
| * [[Par yield]] | |
| * [[Converting from par rates]]
| |
| * [[Bootstrap]]
| |
| * [[Par bond]]
| |
| * [[Coupon]]
| |
| * [[Spot rate]]
| |
| * [[Yield curve]]
| |
| * [[Zero]]
| |
| * [[Zero coupon bond]]
| |
| * [[Flat yield curve]]
| |
| * [[Rising yield curve]]
| |
| * [[Falling yield curve]]
| |
| * [[Positive yield curve]]
| |
| * [[Negative yield curve]]
| |
| | |
| | |
| ===Other resources===
| |
| [[Media:2013_09_Sept_-_Simple_solutions.pdf| The Treasurer students, Simple solutions]]
| |