Fnality International and X-inefficiency: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create page - sources - linked pages & Finality - https://www.fnality.org/home)
 
imported>John Grout
(To create the entry)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''Distributed ledger - payment systems - fintech.''
A term from economics referring to a firm's tendency not to maximise output from its installed equipment, systems, personnel as simple economic theory might suggest. It is often explained by agency costs as managers pursue their own objectives not the interests of shareholders, staff extracting rent for themselves, etc. But sheer human failing may also be important.


Fnality International is a fintech company established to create a network of financial market infrastructures based on Distributed Ledger Technology.
X-inefficiency may also be applied by extension to an industry or to a whole regional or national etc. economy.


An X-efficient firm may, of course, not be allocatively efficient - producing the "right" outputs using the best mix of inputs to produce them.


== See also ==
Leibenstein,Harvey("Allocative Efficiency vs. X-Efficiency", American Economic Review 56(3), June 1996, pp 392–415 is normally taken as the source of the term X-efficiency.
*[[Distributed ledger]]
* [[Financial market infrastructure]]
* [[Interbank Funds Transfer System]]
* [[Payment infrastructure]]
* [[Payment service provider]]
* [[Payment system]]
*[[Sterling Fnality Payment System]]
 
 
==Other resource==
*[https://www.fnality.org/home Fnality - about us]]
 
[[Category:The_business_context]]
[[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]]
[[Category:Manage_risks]]
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]
[[Category:Risk_reporting]]
[[Category:Cash_management]]
[[Category:Financial_products_and_markets]]
[[Category:Liquidity_management]]
[[Category:Technology]]

Revision as of 10:27, 20 September 2013

A term from economics referring to a firm's tendency not to maximise output from its installed equipment, systems, personnel as simple economic theory might suggest. It is often explained by agency costs as managers pursue their own objectives not the interests of shareholders, staff extracting rent for themselves, etc. But sheer human failing may also be important.

X-inefficiency may also be applied by extension to an industry or to a whole regional or national etc. economy.

An X-efficient firm may, of course, not be allocatively efficient - producing the "right" outputs using the best mix of inputs to produce them.

Leibenstein,Harvey("Allocative Efficiency vs. X-Efficiency", American Economic Review 56(3), June 1996, pp 392–415 is normally taken as the source of the term X-efficiency.