Risk reporting and Structural subordination: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Link with Risk management reporting page.)
 
imported>Administrator
(CSV import)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The communication of risk and risk management outcomes for the purposes of comparing the results with the policy and the early identification of potential problems.
''Risk management''.
An effective reduction in the ranking of the claim of a lender or other creditor resulting from a combination of:
(1) The ownership structure of the borrower, for example in a group of companies; and  
(2) Holding a claim against the 'wrong' legal entity.


For example, the claims of the creditors of a holding company may become structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of the subsidiary companies in the same group.  This is because the claim of the holding company itself - as a shareholder of the subsidiary - is generally subordinated to the claims of the other creditors of the subsidiary.


==See also==
This can be particularly problematic where the subsidiary is in a different country from the holding company, where local legal and other claims may effectively erode the position of the holding company's creditors.
* [[Risk assessment]]
 
* [[Risk evaluation]]
== See also ==
* [[Risk identification]]
* [[Subordination]]
* [[Risk management]]
* [[Risk management reporting]]
* [[Risk policy]]
* [[Risk response]]
* [[Guide to risk management]]


[[Category:Financial_risk_management]]
[[Category:Risk_reporting]]

Revision as of 14:20, 23 October 2012

Risk management. An effective reduction in the ranking of the claim of a lender or other creditor resulting from a combination of: (1) The ownership structure of the borrower, for example in a group of companies; and (2) Holding a claim against the 'wrong' legal entity.

For example, the claims of the creditors of a holding company may become structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of the subsidiary companies in the same group. This is because the claim of the holding company itself - as a shareholder of the subsidiary - is generally subordinated to the claims of the other creditors of the subsidiary.

This can be particularly problematic where the subsidiary is in a different country from the holding company, where local legal and other claims may effectively erode the position of the holding company's creditors.

See also