Conduct and Mandate: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Update links.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Layout.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The manner in which an organisation or an individual behaves.
An authoritative command or instruction, for example to a bank by its customer.


Especially in the context of the risk of misconduct, such as illegal or unethical behaviour.
More specifically, agreements regulating the dealing relationship between the company and its counterparties, authorising people to conduct transactions, possibly applying limits to the size of deals and procedures concerning settlement, and regulating the opening and closing of transactions.


Mandates are a key element of treasury [[controls]] and are an essential mechanism for reducing the company’s dealing risk.


==See also==
 
* [[ACT Ethical Code]]
 
* [[Code of conduct]]
== See also ==
* [[Code of practice]]
 
* [[Conduct risk]]
* [[Bond mandate]]
* [[Financial Conduct Authority]]
 
* [[Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation]]
 
===Other links===
[http://www.treasurers.org/node/7973 Bank Mandates, Will Spinney, ACT 2012]
 
[[Category:Compliance_and_audit]]
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]
[[Category:Cash_management]]
[[Category:Treasury_operations_infrastructure]]

Revision as of 09:13, 11 May 2015

An authoritative command or instruction, for example to a bank by its customer.

More specifically, agreements regulating the dealing relationship between the company and its counterparties, authorising people to conduct transactions, possibly applying limits to the size of deals and procedures concerning settlement, and regulating the opening and closing of transactions.

Mandates are a key element of treasury controls and are an essential mechanism for reducing the company’s dealing risk.


See also


Other links

Bank Mandates, Will Spinney, ACT 2012