IBR and Make whole clause: Difference between pages
From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
imported>Doug Williamson (Update following creation of Incremental borrowing rate page.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Link with Clause page.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'' | ''US - securities'' | ||
A strong form of protection for lenders/investors in securities, designed to mitigate the adverse effects of call risk for investors. | |||
Under a make whole clause the borrower/issuer has to value the cash flows beyond the date of the early call/redemption at the US government bond yield. | |||
==See also== | This potentially makes it prohibitively expensive for the issuer to take an early redemption. | ||
*[[ | |||
*[[ | The consequence of a make whole clause for the investor is that they can re-invest the redemption monies in US government stock, thus preserving their originally expected cash inflows at lower risk. | ||
*[[ | |||
*[[ | Make whole clauses are similar in their effect to Spens clauses. | ||
== See also == | |||
* [[Call risk]] | |||
* [[Clause]] | |||
* [[Security]] | |||
* [[Spens clause]] | |||
Revision as of 19:28, 4 September 2017
US - securities
A strong form of protection for lenders/investors in securities, designed to mitigate the adverse effects of call risk for investors.
Under a make whole clause the borrower/issuer has to value the cash flows beyond the date of the early call/redemption at the US government bond yield.
This potentially makes it prohibitively expensive for the issuer to take an early redemption.
The consequence of a make whole clause for the investor is that they can re-invest the redemption monies in US government stock, thus preserving their originally expected cash inflows at lower risk.
Make whole clauses are similar in their effect to Spens clauses.
