Rewarded risk: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Spacing and category added)
imported>Doug Williamson
(Align with Unrewarded risk page.)
Line 1: Line 1:
A rewarded risk is one which is associated with an expected benefit for the party accepting the risk.
Rewarded and unrewarded risk can be a useful way to analyse risks.  


For example a greater net return (or a smaller net cost) for the party accepting the risk.
It can indicate whether a particular risk is a legitimate risk for the organisation (and consistent with the organisation’s strategy) or not.
 
An example of a rewarded risk is a capital investment decision, such as acquiring a business or a new machine, launching a new product and so on.
 
Such an investment will be made because there is a reasonable expectation of an acceptable net positive return, and hence an expectation of an increase in shareholder wealth.


So it may be rational - depending on the size and likelihood of the expected benefit, and the organisation's risk appetite and policy - to accept a rewarded risk.





Revision as of 16:27, 23 March 2015

Rewarded and unrewarded risk can be a useful way to analyse risks.

It can indicate whether a particular risk is a legitimate risk for the organisation (and consistent with the organisation’s strategy) or not.


An example of a rewarded risk is a capital investment decision, such as acquiring a business or a new machine, launching a new product and so on.

Such an investment will be made because there is a reasonable expectation of an acceptable net positive return, and hence an expectation of an increase in shareholder wealth.


See also