Compounding effect and Efficient market hypothesis: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Improve calculations.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Layout.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The additional growth or additional interest, resulting from the compounding effects of - for example - interest on interest.
(EMH).  


Another example is the compounding effect of growth on growth.  
The efficient market hypothesis that markets operate efficiently. In other words, that assets are fairly priced by the market mechanism to incorporate available information.


There are three forms of potential efficiency: the weak form, the semi-strong form and the strong form.


'''Example'''
#The <u>weak form</u> states that past prices are no guide to future prices, so charting techniques cannot be used to make excess returns.
#The <u>semi-strong form</u> states that prices react to public information so that any form of analysis using publicly available information cannot be successful in consistently generating excess returns.
#The <u>strong form</u> states that even insider information cannot generate consistent excess returns.


Interest quoted at 6% per annum, compounded annually, for two years maturity, means that the interest accumulated after two years is:


= (1.06 x 1.06) - 1
Important implications of the efficient market hypothesis for financial managers include:
* Keeping the financial markets well-informed.
* Taking market price movements seriously.
* Not attempting to 'fine tune' the timing of security issues.


= 12.36% for the two year period.
Also known as the Efficient markets hypothesis.




Without the additional interest on interest, the total interest would have been simply
In practice, extreme market outturns occur more commonly than predicted by simple efficient markets theory.


6% per annum x 2 years
As a consequence, the simplistic application of efficient markets theory to risk analysis will systematically:
 
* Overstate market stability, and
= 12.00%.
* Understate related market risks.
 
 
So the compounding effect of interest on interest here
 
= 12.36% - 12.00%
 
= 0.36% over the two year period (= 6% x 6%).
 
 
When both the number of periods and the rate of growth/interest are low, compounding effects are relatively small.
 
When either the number of periods or the rate of growth/interest - or both - are greater, compounding effects quickly become very much larger.




== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Compound interest]]
* [[Asymmetry of information]]
* [[Compounding factor]]
* [[Efficiency]]
* [[Continuously compounded rate of return]]
* [[Efficient market]]
* [[Discount]]
* [[Fractal markets hypothesis]]
* [[Interest rate parity]]
* [[No free lunch]]
* [[Perfect competition]]
* [[Semi-strong market efficiency]]
* [[Strong form efficiency]]
* [[Weak form efficiency]]


[[Category:The_business_context]]
[[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]]
[[Category:Manage_risks]]
[[Category:Manage_risks]]
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]
[[Category:Risk_reporting]]
[[Category:Financial_products_and_markets]]

Revision as of 15:59, 24 December 2019

(EMH).

The efficient market hypothesis that markets operate efficiently. In other words, that assets are fairly priced by the market mechanism to incorporate available information.

There are three forms of potential efficiency: the weak form, the semi-strong form and the strong form.

  1. The weak form states that past prices are no guide to future prices, so charting techniques cannot be used to make excess returns.
  2. The semi-strong form states that prices react to public information so that any form of analysis using publicly available information cannot be successful in consistently generating excess returns.
  3. The strong form states that even insider information cannot generate consistent excess returns.


Important implications of the efficient market hypothesis for financial managers include:

  • Keeping the financial markets well-informed.
  • Taking market price movements seriously.
  • Not attempting to 'fine tune' the timing of security issues.

Also known as the Efficient markets hypothesis.


In practice, extreme market outturns occur more commonly than predicted by simple efficient markets theory.

As a consequence, the simplistic application of efficient markets theory to risk analysis will systematically:

  • Overstate market stability, and
  • Understate related market risks.


See also