Company voluntary arrangement and Dividend irrelevancy theory: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Expand.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Expand to incorporate clientele effect.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''UK insolvency law.''
In financial theory dividend payments and policies should be irrelevant when financial markets are efficient.  


(CVA).
But in practice decisions about dividend levels are important because of:


An agreement between a company and its creditors concerning the payment of its debts under the provisions of UK insolvency law.
#Their informational content. This informational content is known as ''signalling''.
#The potential to move closer to, or away from, a firm's optimal capital structure.
#Possibly, [[clientele]] effects.


The CVA may be initiated by the directors, the administrator or the liquidator of a company. If agreed to, it involves claims being settled at a given percentage of the full liability, with a view to the company surviving thereafter.


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Administrator]]
* [[Lintner]]
* [[Insolvency]]
* [[Residual theory]]
* [[Insolvency practitioner]]
* [[Rights issue]]
* [[Liquidator]]
* [[Theoretical ex-rights price]]
 
* [[Capital structure]]
[[Category:Compliance_and_audit]]
* [[Clientele]]

Revision as of 07:08, 9 February 2015

In financial theory dividend payments and policies should be irrelevant when financial markets are efficient.

But in practice decisions about dividend levels are important because of:

  1. Their informational content. This informational content is known as signalling.
  2. The potential to move closer to, or away from, a firm's optimal capital structure.
  3. Possibly, clientele effects.


See also