Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Lognormally distributed share returns: Difference between pages
From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
imported>Doug Williamson (Add link.) |
imported>Administrator (CSV import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If share returns are lognormally distributed it means that the logarithm of [1 + the share return] has a normal probability distribution. | |||
Normal distributions have infinitely long ‘tails’ both upside and downside - so implying unlimited downside potential when used for modelling share returns. | |||
But the theoretically worst outcome for a share investor is to lose the whole of their investment - in other words a negative return of -100%. It is not theoretically possible to suffer a return of worse than -100%. | |||
It | |||
Lognormal distributions - unlike normal distributions - also have a limited downside, so they do not suffer from this theoretical shortcoming. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[ | * [[Lognormal frequency distribution]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Normal distribution]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Volatility]] | ||
Revision as of 14:20, 23 October 2012
If share returns are lognormally distributed it means that the logarithm of [1 + the share return] has a normal probability distribution.
Normal distributions have infinitely long ‘tails’ both upside and downside - so implying unlimited downside potential when used for modelling share returns.
But the theoretically worst outcome for a share investor is to lose the whole of their investment - in other words a negative return of -100%. It is not theoretically possible to suffer a return of worse than -100%.
Lognormal distributions - unlike normal distributions - also have a limited downside, so they do not suffer from this theoretical shortcoming.
See also