Exotic: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Mend link.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Add link.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:''The Treasurer magazine, Cash Management Edition April 2019, p8.'' | :''The Treasurer magazine, Cash Management Edition April 2019, p8.'' | ||
| Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
* [[Exotic currencies]] | * [[Exotic currencies]] | ||
* [[Fit for purpose]] | * [[Fit for purpose]] | ||
* [[Linear]] | |||
* [[Plain vanilla]] | * [[Plain vanilla]] | ||
* [[Treasury Committee]] | * [[Treasury Committee]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:38, 13 October 2022
1. Financial contracts.
'Exotic' is a description meaning that there are non-standard features in a financial contract.
2.
More broadly, 'exotic' structures and arrangements are any non-standard ones.
- Corporate criminal liability framework not fit for purpose
- "'Another area of concern,' the UK Treasury Committee stressed, 'is company formation, specifically the role of Companies House, which is not required to carry out any AML checks. This makes it a weakness in the UK's system for preventing economic crime.'
- Meanwhile, contributors to the Committee's research described the UK's corporate criminal liability framework as 'not fit for purpose'.
- Under the current arrangements, the Committee said it is 'typically more difficult to identify which people are the directing mind and will of a larger company than a smaller one, potentially encouraging more exotic management structures to avoid prosecutions'."
- The Treasurer magazine, Cash Management Edition April 2019, p8.
