Geometric mean: Difference between revisions
imported>Doug Williamson m (Spacing 27/8/13) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Classify page.) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Geometric mean returns are calculated by taking account of compounding. | __NOTOC__ | ||
Geometric mean returns or growth are calculated by taking account of compounding. | |||
(Contrasted with the arithmetic mean, which ignores compounding). | (Contrasted with the arithmetic mean, which ignores compounding). | ||
(1.04 x 1.05 x 1.06)<sup>(1/3)</sup> -1 = 4.9968%. | ===<span style="color:#4B0082">Example 1: Positive returns or growth</span>=== | ||
The geometric mean return calculated from sample returns of 4%, 5% and 6% is given by: | |||
(1.04 x 1.05 x 1.06)<sup>(1/3)</sup> - 1 | |||
= '''4.9968%'''. | |||
===Relationship between geometric mean and arithmetic mean=== | |||
When returns or growth are positive, geometric means are smaller figures than arithmetic means. | |||
In Example 1 above, the arithmetic mean is: | |||
(4% + 5% + 6%) / 3 = '''5.0000%''' | |||
''The geometric mean of +4.9968% is a smaller positive number than the [[arithmetic mean]] of +5.0000%.'' | |||
On the other hand, when returns or growth are ''negative'', the geometric mean is a larger negative number - further away from zero - than the arithmetic mean. | |||
===<span style="color:#4B0082">Example 2: Negative returns or decline</span>=== | |||
The geometric mean return calculated from three ''negative'' sample returns of -(4)%, -(5)% and -(6)% is given by: | |||
( (1 - 0.04) x (1 - 0.05) x (1 - 0.06) )<sup>(1/3)</sup> - 1 | |||
(0.96 x 0.95 x 0.94)<sup>(1/3)</sup> - 1 | |||
= '''-(5.0035)%'''. | |||
The negative geometric mean of -(5.0035)% is a larger negative number - further away from zero - than the arithmetic mean of -(5.0000)%. | |||
(The arithmetic mean of the negative returns of -(4)%, -(5)% and -(6)% is the three items added together and divided by 3.) | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Arithmetic mean]] | * [[Arithmetic mean]] | ||
* [[Compound Annual Growth Rate]] (CAGR) | |||
[[Category:The_business_context]] | |||
Latest revision as of 07:57, 27 June 2022
Geometric mean returns or growth are calculated by taking account of compounding.
(Contrasted with the arithmetic mean, which ignores compounding).
Example 1: Positive returns or growth
The geometric mean return calculated from sample returns of 4%, 5% and 6% is given by:
(1.04 x 1.05 x 1.06)(1/3) - 1
= 4.9968%.
Relationship between geometric mean and arithmetic mean
When returns or growth are positive, geometric means are smaller figures than arithmetic means.
In Example 1 above, the arithmetic mean is:
(4% + 5% + 6%) / 3 = 5.0000%
The geometric mean of +4.9968% is a smaller positive number than the arithmetic mean of +5.0000%.
On the other hand, when returns or growth are negative, the geometric mean is a larger negative number - further away from zero - than the arithmetic mean.
Example 2: Negative returns or decline
The geometric mean return calculated from three negative sample returns of -(4)%, -(5)% and -(6)% is given by:
( (1 - 0.04) x (1 - 0.05) x (1 - 0.06) )(1/3) - 1
(0.96 x 0.95 x 0.94)(1/3) - 1
= -(5.0035)%.
The negative geometric mean of -(5.0035)% is a larger negative number - further away from zero - than the arithmetic mean of -(5.0000)%.
(The arithmetic mean of the negative returns of -(4)%, -(5)% and -(6)% is the three items added together and divided by 3.)
