Unrelated party: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Add example and link with Arm's length principle concept and page.) |
imported>Doug Williamson m (Update links.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Unrelated parties are companies or other entities which are independent of each other, so that they are normally assumed to be dealing with each other at fair market prices. | Unrelated parties are companies or other entities which are independent of each other, so that they are normally assumed to be dealing with each other at fair market prices. | ||
Relevant accounting standards include Section 33 of FRS 102. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
*[[FRS | *[[Arm%E2%80%99s length principle]] | ||
*[[FRS 102]] | |||
* [[Party]] | |||
*[[Related party]] | |||
*[[Transfer pricing]] | *[[Transfer pricing]] | ||
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:52, 15 July 2021
The concept of related and unrelated parties arises in the context of the arm's length principle.
Under the arm's length principle, transactions between related parties are conducted and priced as if they were unrelated, so that there is no question of either:
- A conflict of interest, or
- Tax avoidance.
Unrelated parties are companies or other entities which are independent of each other, so that they are normally assumed to be dealing with each other at fair market prices.
Relevant accounting standards include Section 33 of FRS 102.
