Unrelated party and Unrewarded risk: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Mend link.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Update and expand for clarity. Source: ACT CertT.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The concept of related and unrelated parties arises in the context of the arm's length principle.
Rewarded and unrewarded risk can be a useful way to analyse risks.  


Under the arm's length principle, transactions between related parties are conducted and priced as if they were unrelated, so that there is no question of either:
It can indicate whether a particular risk is a legitimate risk for the organisation (and consistent with the organisation’s strategy) or not.


* A conflict of interest, or
* Tax avoidance.




Unrelated parties are companies or other entities which are independent of each other, so that they are normally assumed to be dealing with each other at fair market prices.
== Rewarded risk ==
An example of a rewarded risk is a capital investment decision, such as acquiring a business or a new machine, launching a new product and so on.
 
Such an investment will be made because there is a reasonable expectation of an acceptable net positive return, and hence an expectation of an increase in shareholder wealth.
 
 
== Unrewarded risk ==
 
Examples of unrewarded risk are operational risks such as the risks of systems failure, fire or theft, all of which may be costly to manage, and which there is no return for taking.
Clearly risk which is unrewarded is best avoided where there is no cost to doing so. However, many unrewarded risks, such as the risk of fire or theft, are inevitable in business, and must be managed as cost-effectively as possible.
 
For example by comparing insurance providers in order to get the best deal. The cost of managing unrewarded risks must be covered by (and thus reduces) the net positive returns earned from rewarded risks.
 






== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[FRS 8]]
* [[Rewarded risk]]
*[[Transfer pricing]]
 
*[[Arm%E2%80%99s length principle]]
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]
*[[Related party]]

Revision as of 16:20, 23 March 2015

Rewarded and unrewarded risk can be a useful way to analyse risks.

It can indicate whether a particular risk is a legitimate risk for the organisation (and consistent with the organisation’s strategy) or not.


Rewarded risk

An example of a rewarded risk is a capital investment decision, such as acquiring a business or a new machine, launching a new product and so on.

Such an investment will be made because there is a reasonable expectation of an acceptable net positive return, and hence an expectation of an increase in shareholder wealth.


Unrewarded risk

Examples of unrewarded risk are operational risks such as the risks of systems failure, fire or theft, all of which may be costly to manage, and which there is no return for taking.

Clearly risk which is unrewarded is best avoided where there is no cost to doing so. However, many unrewarded risks, such as the risk of fire or theft, are inevitable in business, and must be managed as cost-effectively as possible.

For example by comparing insurance providers in order to get the best deal. The cost of managing unrewarded risks must be covered by (and thus reduces) the net positive returns earned from rewarded risks.



See also