Waterfall methodology: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Add definitions. Sources: linked pages.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Layout.) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Waterfall methodologies are designed to improve consistency and objectivity. | Waterfall methodologies are designed to improve consistency and objectivity. | ||
Line 58: | Line 36: | ||
== Other | == Other link == | ||
[https://www.treasurers.org/hub/blog/LIBORtransition/Guidance/onEURIBOR/fallbacks LIBOR transition: EURIBOR fallbacks - ECB publishes recommendations, ACT Blog 18 May 2021] | [https://www.treasurers.org/hub/blog/LIBORtransition/Guidance/onEURIBOR/fallbacks LIBOR transition: EURIBOR fallbacks - ECB publishes recommendations, ACT Blog 18 May 2021] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:12, 25 April 2022
1. Project management.
A linear and sequential approach to project management.
Contrasted with agile methodology.
2. Risk-free rates - valuation.
Similarly predetermined steps and prioritisation in determining the basis of contributions to the calculation of risk-free interest rates.
Waterfall methodologies are designed to improve consistency and objectivity.
3. Other contexts.
Similar approaches in other contexts.
See also
- Agile
- Equity
- Fallback
- Funding stack
- Junior debt
- LIBOR
- Liquidation
- Preferential creditor
- Project management
- Risk-free rates
- Senior debt
- Seniority
- Subordinated debt
- Valuation
- Waterfall
Other link
LIBOR transition: EURIBOR fallbacks - ECB publishes recommendations, ACT Blog 18 May 2021