Dual reporting: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Align headings.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Classify page.) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[EMIR]] | * [[EMIR]] | ||
* [[FC]] | |||
* [[Legal entity identifier]] | |||
* [[MiFID]] | * [[MiFID]] | ||
* [[NFC]] | * [[NFC]] | ||
* [[SSR]] | * [[SSR]] | ||
* [[Trade repository]] | |||
== Other resource== | |||
[https://www.treasurers.org/ACTmedia/EMIR_Consulation_Response_August_2015.pdf ACT's EMIR Consultation Response, August 2015] | [https://www.treasurers.org/ACTmedia/EMIR_Consulation_Response_August_2015.pdf ACT's EMIR Consultation Response, August 2015] | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]] | |||
Revision as of 21:05, 29 June 2022
The prevailing system of reporting under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation[1] (EMIR), under which both parties to a transaction are required to report it.
Sometimes known as 'DSR' (Dual-Sided Reporting).
The Association of Corporate Treasurers and others are lobbying for a system of single-sided reporting (SSR) of transactions between financial counterparties (FCs) and non-financial counterparties (NFCs), under which only the financial counterparty would be required to report the trade.
See also
Other resource
ACT's EMIR Consultation Response, August 2015
