Analysis paralysis: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson m (Categorise.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Add link.) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*[[Project analysis]] | *[[Project analysis]] | ||
*[[Regret risk]] | *[[Regret risk]] | ||
*[[Zero-sum game]] | |||
[[Category:Self_management_and_accountability]] | [[Category:Self_management_and_accountability]] | ||
[[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]] | [[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]] | ||
[[Category:Manage_risks]] | [[Category:Manage_risks]] |
Revision as of 09:15, 20 March 2021
Excessively detailed or time-consuming review of decisions, including minor decisions.
Analysis paralysis usually involves being too fearful about the potential disadvantages of a course of action.
It can result in substantial lost opportunity costs.
Cures for analysis paralysis include:
- Recognising that delay and inaction are also choices, which can carry a significant cost, especially in lost opportunities.
- Appropriately identifying which major projects and decisions truly warrant very detailed review, and making quicker decisions about other minor projects.
- A culture of taking swift remedial action as projects evolve and opportunities to improve are identified.
- Heuristics.