Monte Carlo method: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Spacing 22/8/13)
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Category added 9/10/13)
Line 34: Line 34:
* [[Stochastic]]
* [[Stochastic]]
* [[Value at risk]]
* [[Value at risk]]
[[Category:Managing_Risk]]

Revision as of 14:12, 9 October 2013

In Value at Risk analysis, an alternative method for calculating the probability distribution (rather than using the Delta-normal method or the Historical simulation method).

Monte Carlo simulations consist of two steps:

First, a stochastic process for financial variables is specified as well as process parameters.
Both historical data and appropriate judgement can be used for such parameters as risk and correlations.


Second, fictitious price paths are simulated for all variables of interest. At each horizon considered, the portfolio is marked-to-market using full valuation.
A distribution of returns is eventually produced, from which a VaR figure can be measured.


Comparing the methods:

1. The Delta-normal method is the simplest method to implement.
The main drawbacks are the assumption that risk factors have normal distributions, and the assumption that the assets are linear (in other words, that they do not contain options).
2. The Historical simulation method is also relatively simple to implement.
The main drawback is that the historical information used may not adequately represent future probability distributions. (This is also a drawback of the delta-normal method.)


Monte Carlo techniques are designed to address these shortcomings.

Disadvantages of Monte Carlo methods include their relative complexity.


See also