Interest cover: Difference between revisions
imported>Administrator (CSV import) |
imported>Doug Williamson m (Spacing 22/8/13) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. | 1. | ||
From a whole-firm perspective, interest cover is the ratio of Profit before interest and tax ÷ Interest payable. | From a whole-firm perspective, interest cover is the ratio of Profit before interest and tax ÷ Interest payable. | ||
Interest cover measures the safety or sustainability of the future debt servicing flows, from the perspective of the lenders. | Interest cover measures the safety or sustainability of the future debt servicing flows, from the perspective of the lenders. | ||
The greater the interest cover ratio, the greater the likelihood that the firm paying the debt interest (and other debt servicing costs) will continue to be able to service the debt in the future. So a higher cover ratio is associated with lower risk for the debt investors. | The greater the interest cover ratio, the greater the likelihood that the firm paying the debt interest (and other debt servicing costs) will continue to be able to service the debt in the future. | ||
So a higher cover ratio is associated with lower risk for the debt investors. | |||
In the theoretical situation where the cover ratio fell below 1.0, the interest would be said to be ''uncovered'' and the debt would not be sustainable at its previous level unless there was a recovery in the firm's operating profitability. | In the theoretical situation where the cover ratio fell below 1.0, the interest would be said to be ''uncovered'' and the debt would not be sustainable at its previous level unless there was a recovery in the firm's operating profitability. | ||
In practice lenders want much higher minimum interest cover ratios than 1.0, such higher minimum usually stipulated in the related loan documentation. So the borrower in this situation would be likely to be already in breach of a related borrowings covenant. | In practice lenders want much higher minimum interest cover ratios than 1.0, such higher minimum usually stipulated in the related loan documentation. | ||
So the borrower in this situation would be likely to be already in breach of a related borrowings covenant. | |||
Also known as the Interest cover ratio. | Also known as the Interest cover ratio. | ||
2. | 2. | ||
An analogous measure, in relation to an individual tranche or class of debt (rather than to the whole firm). | An analogous measure, in relation to an individual tranche or class of debt (rather than to the whole firm). | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
| Line 20: | Line 29: | ||
* [[Profit before interest and tax]] | * [[Profit before interest and tax]] | ||
* [[Uncovered]] | * [[Uncovered]] | ||
Revision as of 15:12, 22 August 2013
1.
From a whole-firm perspective, interest cover is the ratio of Profit before interest and tax ÷ Interest payable.
Interest cover measures the safety or sustainability of the future debt servicing flows, from the perspective of the lenders.
The greater the interest cover ratio, the greater the likelihood that the firm paying the debt interest (and other debt servicing costs) will continue to be able to service the debt in the future.
So a higher cover ratio is associated with lower risk for the debt investors.
In the theoretical situation where the cover ratio fell below 1.0, the interest would be said to be uncovered and the debt would not be sustainable at its previous level unless there was a recovery in the firm's operating profitability.
In practice lenders want much higher minimum interest cover ratios than 1.0, such higher minimum usually stipulated in the related loan documentation.
So the borrower in this situation would be likely to be already in breach of a related borrowings covenant.
Also known as the Interest cover ratio.
2.
An analogous measure, in relation to an individual tranche or class of debt (rather than to the whole firm).
