Restitution: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Add quote - source - The Treasurer online - 6 May 2022 - https://www.treasurers.org/hub/treasurer-magazine/esg-led-litigation-and-what-it-means-for-treasurers) |
(Mend link.) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[ | * [[Environmental, social and governance]] (ESG) | ||
* [[Issuer]] | * [[Issuer]] | ||
* [[Law]] | * [[Law]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:43, 3 August 2024
Law.
The legal principle that where a person has benefited undeservedly at another's expense, that person may be required to restore any improper benefit obtained.
- ESG litigants not seeking financial restitution
- "The main risks to issuers from the rising incidence of ESG-related litigation are not financial but strategic and operational, as many ESG lawsuits seek structural changes in business practice rather than financial restitution."
- The Treasurer online - 6 May 2022.
