Parallel risk and Probability: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create the page. Sources: linked pages and BIS http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d368.pdf)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Layout.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''Interest rate risk.''
The study of chance providing an objective measure of uncertainty.


Parallel risk is the risk of adverse effects from parallel changes in interest rates.


This risk is relatively simpler to analyse, compared with non-parallel risk.
Probabilities range between 1 (=100%) and 0 (=0%). 
 
A probability of 100% means that an event is considered certain to occur.
 
A probability of 0% means that an event is considered certain not to occur. 
 
 
For example, flipping an unbiased coin, the probability of getting a head is often modelled as 50%.
 
 
This simple model of a coin flip assumes that the only two possibilities are a head or a tail.  Applying such simple models to financial situations, and treating financial outcomes as simple coin flips, may lead to errors resulting from:
 
#The coin landing on its edge 'more often than it's supposed to'.
#The underlying assumption of an unbiased coin not being a valid one. This kind of assumption is usually much too simple.




== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Back test]]
* [[Black swan]]
* [[Interest rate risk]]
* [[Conditional probability]]
* [[IRRBB]]
* [[Confidence interval]]
* [[Non-parallel risk]]
* [[Frequency distribution]]
* [[Parallel shock]]
* [[Mutually exclusive]]
* [[Shock]]
* [[Poisson distribution]]
* [[Yield curve risk]]

Revision as of 15:19, 8 June 2016

The study of chance providing an objective measure of uncertainty.


Probabilities range between 1 (=100%) and 0 (=0%).

A probability of 100% means that an event is considered certain to occur.

A probability of 0% means that an event is considered certain not to occur.


For example, flipping an unbiased coin, the probability of getting a head is often modelled as 50%.


This simple model of a coin flip assumes that the only two possibilities are a head or a tail. Applying such simple models to financial situations, and treating financial outcomes as simple coin flips, may lead to errors resulting from:

  1. The coin landing on its edge 'more often than it's supposed to'.
  2. The underlying assumption of an unbiased coin not being a valid one. This kind of assumption is usually much too simple.


See also