Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process and International Fisher Effect: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Mend link.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Update example.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''Bank supervision - capital adequacy.''
This theory predicts that the spot foreign exchange (FX) rate will change over time to reflect and offset differences in interest rates in the respective currencies.  


(ICAAP).
So for example, unhedged currency depreciation losses will on average negate and match exactly any gains on interest differentials between the two currencies.


The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process of a bank takes the form of a document which:
*Provides details of how the bank assesses its individual capital needs and manages its capital position; and
*Explains the bank's management and control processes.


The International Fisher Effect links Expectations Theory in FX markets with Interest Rate Parity.


It is approved by the bank's management body, and submitted to the regulator as part of the regulator's capital adequacy supervision of the bank.
Interest rate parity theory predicts that forward FX rates will reflect interest rate differentials.
 
Expectations Theory predicts that forward FX rates will be reflected - on average - by outturn spot FX rates for the same maturities.
 
 
One way of speculating about this relationship is an FX ''carry trade''.  The trader speculates that the spot exchange rate will ''not'' change by as much as predicted by the International Fisher Effect.
 
Among other things, the International Fisher Effect suggests that it should not be possible to earn consistent profits by entering such FX carry trade speculations.
 
This is because of no-arbitrage theory, which suggests that it should not be possible to earn consistent speculative profits by speculating against Expectations Theory in any market.




== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Bank supervision]]
* [[Carry trade]]
* [[Capital adequacy]]
* [[Depreciation]]
* [[Governance]]
* [[Expectations theory]]
* [[Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process]]
* [[Fisher Effect]]
* [[Pillar 2]]
* [[Foreign currency]]
* [[Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process]] (SREP)
* [[Forward rate]]
* [[Four way equivalence model]]
* [[Interest rate parity]]
* [[No arbitrage conditions]]
* [[Outturn]]
* [[Purchasing power parity]]
* [[Spot rate]]


[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
[[Category:The_business_context]]
[[Category:The_business_context]]
[[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]]
[[Category:Manage_risks]]
[[Category:Cash_management]]
[[Category:Financial_products_and_markets]]
[[Category:Liquidity_management]]

Revision as of 17:56, 22 June 2021

This theory predicts that the spot foreign exchange (FX) rate will change over time to reflect and offset differences in interest rates in the respective currencies.

So for example, unhedged currency depreciation losses will on average negate and match exactly any gains on interest differentials between the two currencies.


The International Fisher Effect links Expectations Theory in FX markets with Interest Rate Parity.

Interest rate parity theory predicts that forward FX rates will reflect interest rate differentials.

Expectations Theory predicts that forward FX rates will be reflected - on average - by outturn spot FX rates for the same maturities.


One way of speculating about this relationship is an FX carry trade. The trader speculates that the spot exchange rate will not change by as much as predicted by the International Fisher Effect.

Among other things, the International Fisher Effect suggests that it should not be possible to earn consistent profits by entering such FX carry trade speculations.

This is because of no-arbitrage theory, which suggests that it should not be possible to earn consistent speculative profits by speculating against Expectations Theory in any market.


See also