Analysis paralysis: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Remove duplication.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Qualify as 'other' minor projects.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Cures for analysis paralysis include: | Cures for analysis paralysis include: | ||
#Recognising that delay and inaction are also choices, which can carry a significant cost, especially in lost opportunities. | #Recognising that delay and inaction are also choices, which can carry a significant cost, especially in lost opportunities. | ||
#Appropriately identifying which major projects and decisions warrant such detailed review, and making quicker decisions about minor projects. | #Appropriately identifying which major projects and decisions warrant such detailed review, and making quicker decisions about other minor projects. | ||
#A culture of taking swift remedial action as projects evolve and opportunities to improve are identified. | #A culture of taking swift remedial action as projects evolve and opportunities to improve are identified. | ||
Revision as of 09:51, 2 May 2016
Excessively detailed or time-consuming review of decisions, including minor decisions. Analysis paralysis usually involves being too fearful about the potential disadvantages of a course of action.
Cures for analysis paralysis include:
- Recognising that delay and inaction are also choices, which can carry a significant cost, especially in lost opportunities.
- Appropriately identifying which major projects and decisions warrant such detailed review, and making quicker decisions about other minor projects.
- A culture of taking swift remedial action as projects evolve and opportunities to improve are identified.
