Arm’s length principle: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Linked to The Treasurers Handbook - Legal implications of cash pooling structures)
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Categorise.)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
When a transaction between two related or affiliated parties is conducted (and priced) as if they were unrelated, so that there is no question of a conflict of interest (or of tax avoidance).
When a transaction between two related or affiliated parties is conducted and priced as if they were unrelated, so that there is no question of either:
 
* A conflict of interest, or
* Tax avoidance.




== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Conflict of interest]]
* [[Tax avoidance]]
* [[Tax avoidance]]
* [[Transfer pricing]]
* [[Transfer pricing]]
* [[Legal implications of cash pooling structures]]
* [[Legal implications of cash pooling structures]]
* [[Principal]]
* [[Related party]]
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]

Latest revision as of 11:06, 28 February 2018

When a transaction between two related or affiliated parties is conducted and priced as if they were unrelated, so that there is no question of either:

  • A conflict of interest, or
  • Tax avoidance.


See also