IFRS 16 and Weighted average cost of capital: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Add link to IAS Plus)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Formatting and layout clarification, following feedback from Tony Nuttall.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
International Financial Reporting Standard 16, dealing with leases.
(WACC).  


IFRS 16 replaces IAS 17: Leases.
'''1.'''


IFRS 16 is mandatory - for companies reporting under international financial reporting standards - from 1 January 2019.
The average cost of capital of a firm, taking into account:


(1) All sources of capital


IFRS 16 requires most lease liabilities to be accounted for 'on balance sheet'.
(2) Weighted by their current market values.


This change removes the former distinction between [[operating lease]]s and [[finance lease]]s.


For a firm with both equity and debt capital, the WACC would be calculated as:


Broadly speaking, IFRS 16 requires all leases to be recognised on the balance sheet, other than short term leases or those for low value assets.


The leases to be brought 'on balance sheet' under IFRS 16 include most operating leases that were 'off balance sheet' under IAS 17.
WACC = Ke x ''proportion of equity'' + Kd(1-t) x ''proportion of debt''


IFRS 16 leads to increased transparency and improved comparability between companies that lease and companies that borrow to buy assets.
= Ke x E/[D+E] + Kd(1-t) x D/[D+E]




However, for many companies IFRS 16 results in material restatements of their balance sheets and - to a lesser extent - income statements.
''Where:''


The main balance sheet impact is to 'gross up' both assets and liabilities by the capital amounts of the leases.
Ke = cost of equity.


The main income statement impact is to recognise a greater proportion of total costs in the earlier years of the lease. In other words, cost recognition is 'front-end loaded' under IFRS 16.
Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt.


E = market value of equity.


These restatements will normally impact any financial covenant ratios that include ‘debt’, ‘net worth’ or similar indicators, subject to any 'frozen GAAP' provisions.  
D = market value of debt.


EBITDA and the interest cover ratio are also likely to be impacted.




==See also==
'''''Examples'''''
*[[ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)]]
*[[Debt]]
*[[DIA]]
*[[EBITDA]]
*[[Finance lease]]
*[[Frozen GAAP]]
*[[IAS 17]]
*[[Incremental borrowing rate]]
*[[Interest cover]]
*[[Interest rate implicit in a lease]]
*[[Lease]]
*[[Operating lease]]
*[[Off balance sheet]]
*[[Residual value]]
*[[Right of Use]]


For example where:


==Other links==
Ke = cost of equity = 10%
[https://www.treasurers.org/thetreasurer/definitive-guide-to-deriving-ifrs-16-discount-rates Definitive guide to deriving IFRS 16 discount rates: The Treasurer]


Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt = 3.6%


==External link==
E = market value of equity = $100m
*[https://www.https://www.iasplus.com/en-gb/standards/ifrs-en-gb/ifrs-16 IFRS 16


[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
D = market value of debt = $100m
[[Category:Compliance_and_audit]]
 
 
WACC = Ke x E/[D+E] + Kd(1-t) x D/[D+E]
 
= 10% x 100/[100+100=200] + 3.6% x 100/[100+100=200]
 
= 10% x 1/2 + 3.6% x 1/2
 
= 5% + 1.8%
 
= '''6.8%'''
 
 
This weighted average is exactly mid-way between the cost of equity and the after-tax cost of debt, because the proportions of equity and debt are exactly equal in this first example.
 
 
If the proportion of equity were increased to 75% (= 0.75), the proportion of debt would fall to 25% and the WACC might theoretically increase to:
 
= 10% x 0.75 + 3.6% x 0.25
 
= 7.5% + 0.9%
 
= '''8.4%'''
 
 
 
If the firm was "geared up" to reduce the proportion of equity to 25%, and increase the proportion of debt to 75%, the WACC might in theory fall to:
 
= 10% x 0.25 + 3.6% x 0.75
 
= 2.5% + 2.7%
 
= '''5.2%'''
 
 
However, the simple calculations above ignore the change in the risk to shareholders and to debt holders when the firm's [[capital structure]] is changed in this way.
 
 
'''2.'''
 
In order to create or add shareholder value, the managers of this firm would need to earn:
 
(1) An after-tax rate of return on their investment projects
 
(2) Of <u>more than</u> the WACC - of, for example in the first case above, 6.8%.
 
 
== See also ==
* [[Cost of capital]]
* [[Cost of debt]]
* [[Cost of equity]]
* [[Optimal capital structure]]
* [[Shareholder value]]

Revision as of 15:50, 12 June 2013

(WACC).

1.

The average cost of capital of a firm, taking into account:

(1) All sources of capital

(2) Weighted by their current market values.


For a firm with both equity and debt capital, the WACC would be calculated as:


WACC = Ke x proportion of equity + Kd(1-t) x proportion of debt

= Ke x E/[D+E] + Kd(1-t) x D/[D+E]


Where:

Ke = cost of equity.

Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt.

E = market value of equity.

D = market value of debt.


Examples

For example where:

Ke = cost of equity = 10%

Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt = 3.6%

E = market value of equity = $100m

D = market value of debt = $100m


WACC = Ke x E/[D+E] + Kd(1-t) x D/[D+E]

= 10% x 100/[100+100=200] + 3.6% x 100/[100+100=200]

= 10% x 1/2 + 3.6% x 1/2

= 5% + 1.8%

= 6.8%


This weighted average is exactly mid-way between the cost of equity and the after-tax cost of debt, because the proportions of equity and debt are exactly equal in this first example.


If the proportion of equity were increased to 75% (= 0.75), the proportion of debt would fall to 25% and the WACC might theoretically increase to:

= 10% x 0.75 + 3.6% x 0.25

= 7.5% + 0.9%

= 8.4%


If the firm was "geared up" to reduce the proportion of equity to 25%, and increase the proportion of debt to 75%, the WACC might in theory fall to:

= 10% x 0.25 + 3.6% x 0.75

= 2.5% + 2.7%

= 5.2%


However, the simple calculations above ignore the change in the risk to shareholders and to debt holders when the firm's capital structure is changed in this way.


2.

In order to create or add shareholder value, the managers of this firm would need to earn:

(1) An after-tax rate of return on their investment projects

(2) Of more than the WACC - of, for example in the first case above, 6.8%.


See also