Earmarking and Efficient market hypothesis: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Mend link.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Reorder links.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
1. ''Pensions.'' 
(EMH).  


The setting aside, at least notionally, of part of a pension fund for the benefit of a particular member, such as might be the case in a money purchase arrangement.
The hypothesis that markets operate efficiently; that assets are fairly priced by the market mechanism to incorporate available information.


There are three forms of potential efficiency: the weak form, the semi-strong form and the strong form.


2. ''Law.'' 
#The <u>weak form</u> states that past prices are no guide to future prices, so charting techniques cannot be used to make excess returns.
#The <u>semi-strong form</u> states that prices react to public information so that any form of analysis using publicly available information cannot be successful in consistently generating excess returns.
#The <u>strong form</u> states that even insider information cannot generate consistent excess returns.


A court order directing the trustees of a pension scheme to make payments direct to a former spouse of a member; these generally form part of divorce settlements.


Also referred to as an attachment order.
Important implications of the efficient market hypothesis for financial managers include:
* Keeping the financial markets well-informed.
* Taking market price movements seriously.
* Not attempting to 'fine tune' the timing of security issues.


Also known as the Efficient markets hypothesis.


3. ''Other assets.''


More generally, the notional setting aside of a part of any fund of assets for a specific purpose.
In practice, extreme market outturns occur more commonly than predicted by simple efficient markets theory.
 
As a consequence, the simplistic application of efficient markets theory to risk analysis will systematically:
* Overstate market stability, and
* Understate related market risks.




== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Assets]]
* [[Asymmetry of information]]
* [[Defined contribution pension scheme]] = money purchase arrangement
* [[Efficiency]]
* [[Fund]]
* [[Efficient market]]
* [[Member]]
* [[Fractal markets hypothesis]]
* [[Notional]]
* [[Interest rate parity]]
* [[Pension scheme]]
* [[No free lunch]]
* [[Ring fence]]
* [[Perfect competition]]
* [[Trustee]]
* [[Semi-strong market efficiency]]
 
* [[Strong form efficiency]]
[[Category:Compliance_and_audit]]
* [[Weak form efficiency]]
[[Category:Manage_risks]]
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]

Revision as of 08:48, 23 July 2017

(EMH).

The hypothesis that markets operate efficiently; that assets are fairly priced by the market mechanism to incorporate available information.

There are three forms of potential efficiency: the weak form, the semi-strong form and the strong form.

  1. The weak form states that past prices are no guide to future prices, so charting techniques cannot be used to make excess returns.
  2. The semi-strong form states that prices react to public information so that any form of analysis using publicly available information cannot be successful in consistently generating excess returns.
  3. The strong form states that even insider information cannot generate consistent excess returns.


Important implications of the efficient market hypothesis for financial managers include:

  • Keeping the financial markets well-informed.
  • Taking market price movements seriously.
  • Not attempting to 'fine tune' the timing of security issues.

Also known as the Efficient markets hypothesis.


In practice, extreme market outturns occur more commonly than predicted by simple efficient markets theory.

As a consequence, the simplistic application of efficient markets theory to risk analysis will systematically:

  • Overstate market stability, and
  • Understate related market risks.


See also