Constructive obligation: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create page - source - IASplus - https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ias/ias37)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Add link.)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
Under IAS 37, a ''constructive obligation'' arises if past practice creates a valid expectation on the part of a third party, for example, a retail store that has a long-standing policy of allowing customers to return merchandise within, say, a 30-day period.
Under IAS 37, a ''constructive obligation'' arises if past practice creates a valid expectation on the part of a third party, for example, a retail store that has a long-standing policy of allowing customers to return merchandise within, say, a 30-day period.


In turn, an event that creates a constructive obligation can be an ''obligating event''.
 
In turn, an event that creates a constructive obligation can be an ''obligating event'' under IAS 37.




Line 15: Line 16:
* [[International Financial Reporting Standards]]
* [[International Financial Reporting Standards]]
* [[Obligating event]]
* [[Obligating event]]
* [[Obligation]]
* [[Provision]]
* [[Provision]]


[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]

Latest revision as of 00:04, 20 January 2022

Financial reporting - provisions - contingent liabilities - International Accounting Standards - IAS 37.

IAS 37 deals with provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets.

Under IAS 37, a constructive obligation arises if past practice creates a valid expectation on the part of a third party, for example, a retail store that has a long-standing policy of allowing customers to return merchandise within, say, a 30-day period.


In turn, an event that creates a constructive obligation can be an obligating event under IAS 37.


See also