Cost of capital: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Category added 9/10/13)
imported>Doug Williamson
(Updated entry. Source ACT Glossary of terms)
Line 5: Line 5:
For example if a firm's cost of capital is 8%, it must earn a return of at least 8% on its operational investments in order to provide the investors with the minimum investment return of 8% which they require.
For example if a firm's cost of capital is 8%, it must earn a return of at least 8% on its operational investments in order to provide the investors with the minimum investment return of 8% which they require.


The concept of cost of capital is important because when inferior rates of return are earned from operational investments - for example only 5% compared with a cost of capital of 8% - such operations are destructive of shareholder value and need to be improved or discontinued, even though the results of these operations may be profitable when considered in historical cost financial accounting terms.
The concept of cost of capital is important because when inferior rates of return are earned from operational investments - for example only 5% compared with a cost of capital of 8% - such operations are destructive of shareholder value and need to be improved or discontinued.
The results of these operations may appear to be profitable, when considered in simplistic historical cost financial accounting terms.  





Revision as of 15:21, 19 November 2014

Broadly, the rate of return on a firm’s investments which is required to service the providers of the firm’s capital.

Often the term is used in a more specific sense to refer to the weighted average cost of capital of a business.

For example if a firm's cost of capital is 8%, it must earn a return of at least 8% on its operational investments in order to provide the investors with the minimum investment return of 8% which they require.

The concept of cost of capital is important because when inferior rates of return are earned from operational investments - for example only 5% compared with a cost of capital of 8% - such operations are destructive of shareholder value and need to be improved or discontinued. The results of these operations may appear to be profitable, when considered in simplistic historical cost financial accounting terms.


See also