Dunning-Kruger effect: Revision history

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

20 February 2024

29 March 2022

2 April 2021

7 December 2018

11 December 2016

21 July 2014

  • curprev 18:0318:03, 21 July 2014imported>Doug Williamsonm 1,215 bytes −12 Correct typo, previously missing 'the'.
  • curprev 16:3316:33, 21 July 2014imported>Doug Williamsonm 1,227 bytes +2 Correct typo 'relatively'.
  • curprev 11:2811:28, 21 July 2014imported>Doug Williamsonm 1,225 bytes +1 Add comma for clarity.
  • curprev 11:2711:27, 21 July 2014imported>Doug Williamson 1,224 bytes +244 Expand to note broader definition INCLUDING the Impostor syndrome. Source: 'The undue modesty of top performers', American Psychological Society, Current Directions in psychological science, 2003, p85.
  • curprev 11:1911:19, 21 July 2014imported>Doug Williamson 980 bytes −170 Undo revision 14724 by Doug Williamson (talk)
  • curprev 11:1311:13, 21 July 2014imported>Doug Williamsonm 1,150 bytes +170 Widen definition to include Impostor syndrome. Source:

20 July 2014

  • curprev 17:2617:26, 20 July 2014imported>Doug Williamsonm 980 bytes +30 Re-word for clarity.
  • curprev 16:3916:39, 20 July 2014imported>Doug Williamsonm 950 bytes +105 Expand for clarity.
  • curprev 08:0208:02, 20 July 2014imported>Doug Williamsonm 845 bytes +10 Add 'exactly' before 'the same'.
  • curprev 08:0108:01, 20 July 2014imported>Doug Williamson 835 bytes +304 Put 'overestimate' into italics to differentiate Imposter syndrome. Add the cure: Source: Chris Lee, Ars Technica, 25 May 2012: http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/revisiting-why-incompetents-think-theyre-awesome/

18 July 2014

  • curprev 16:3816:38, 18 July 2014imported>Doug Williamson 531 bytes +531 Create the page. Source: Chris Lee, Ars Technica, 25 May 2012: http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/revisiting-why-incompetents-think-theyre-awesome/