Event-driven financing: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create the page. Source: The Treasurer, March 2017, p37.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Add category.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Financing for new strategic investments, contrasted with refinancing existing operations and structures.
Financing for new strategic investments, contrasted with refinancing existing operations and structures.


<span style="color:#4B0082">'''''Go forth and borrow'''''</span>
<span style="color:#4B0082">'''''Go forth and borrow'''''</span>
Line 12: Line 13:
== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Brexit]]
* [[Brexit]]
* [[Investment]]
* [[Refinancing]]
* [[Refinancing]]
[[Category:Investment]]
[[Category:Financial_products_and_markets]]

Latest revision as of 16:48, 16 December 2020

Financing for new strategic investments, contrasted with refinancing existing operations and structures.


Go forth and borrow

"Businesses cannot afford to simply press pause on their strategic investments, especially when the finer details of the UK's future could take years to emerge.
And, with the cost of capital so low, rarely has there been a better time for corporate treasurers to raise event-driven financing."
The Treasurer magazine, March 2017 p37 - Ian Baggott, head of loan markets, Lloyds Bank.


See also