Nemo dat quod non habet and Net present value: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Added Estoppel to see also)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Removed link)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''Law.'' 
(NPV).  


'No-one can give what he has not got.
1.


The general legal rule that a person who does not own property cannot confer it on another, except with the true owner's authority (for example as the true owner's agent).
The total present value of all of the cash flows of a proposal - both positive and negative - netting off negative present values against positive ones.  


There are also a small number of exceptions to this general principle.
For example, the expected future cash inflows from an investment project LESS the initial capital investment outflow at Time 0.
 
 
<span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example'''</span>
 
A project requires an investment today of $100m, with $120m being receivable one year from now.
 
The cost of capital (r) is 10% per annum.
 
 
The NPV of the project is calculated as follows:
 
 
PV of Time 0 outflow $100m
 
= $(100m)
 
 
PV of Time 1 inflow $120m
 
= $120m x 1.1<sup>-1</sup>
 
= $109.09m
 
 
NPV = -$100m + $109.09m
 
= +$9.09m
 
 
 
2.
 
In very simple ''Net Present Value analysis'' the decision rule would be that:
 
(1) All positive NPV opportunities should be accepted.
 
(2) All negative NPV opportunities should be rejected. 
 
 
So the project in the example above would be accepted (on the basis of this simple form of the NPV decision rule) because its NPV is positive, namely +$9.09m.
 
 
However this assumes the unlimited availability of further capital with no increase in the cost of capital.
 
A more refined decision rule is that:
 
#All negative NPV opportunities should still be rejected; while
#All positive NPV opportunities remain eligible for further consideration (rather than automatically being accepted).




== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Advising bank]]
* [[Capital rationing]]
* [[Issuing bank]]
* [[Discounted cash flow]]
*[[Estoppel]]
* [[Economic value added]]
 
* [[Internal rate of return]]
[[Category:Compliance_and_audit]]
* [[Investment appraisal]]
* [[Present value]]
* [[Residual theory]]
* [[Weighted average cost of capital]]

Revision as of 14:07, 16 November 2016

(NPV).

1.

The total present value of all of the cash flows of a proposal - both positive and negative - netting off negative present values against positive ones.

For example, the expected future cash inflows from an investment project LESS the initial capital investment outflow at Time 0.


Example

A project requires an investment today of $100m, with $120m being receivable one year from now.

The cost of capital (r) is 10% per annum.


The NPV of the project is calculated as follows:


PV of Time 0 outflow $100m

= $(100m)


PV of Time 1 inflow $120m

= $120m x 1.1-1

= $109.09m


NPV = -$100m + $109.09m

= +$9.09m


2.

In very simple Net Present Value analysis the decision rule would be that:

(1) All positive NPV opportunities should be accepted.

(2) All negative NPV opportunities should be rejected.


So the project in the example above would be accepted (on the basis of this simple form of the NPV decision rule) because its NPV is positive, namely +$9.09m.


However this assumes the unlimited availability of further capital with no increase in the cost of capital.

A more refined decision rule is that:

  1. All negative NPV opportunities should still be rejected; while
  2. All positive NPV opportunities remain eligible for further consideration (rather than automatically being accepted).


See also