Centralised and Converting from zero coupon rates: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Classify page.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create the page as an extract from the long Zero coupon yield page.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
1. ''Treasury organisation.''
The zero coupon rate is also known as the [[zero coupon yield]], spot rate, or spot yield.


Treasury organisation which retains control at the centre, contrasted with a decentralised approach.


'''Conversion'''


As companies became larger, authority in treasury matters tends to become more centralised in the interests of financial efficiency and control.  
If we know the zero coupon rates (yield curve) for a given risk class and set of maturities, we can calculate both the [[forward yield]]s and the [[par yield]]s for the same maturities and risk class.


However, greater centralisation, if badly handled, can result in local demotivation and poor alignment of treasury policy with local business needs. In particular, local cash management is sometimes considered to be better managed at subsidiary level.


The conversion process and calculation stems from the '[[no-arbitrage]]' relationship between the related yield curves.


In the largest organisations, 'dynamic balance' often applies. This involves the sharing of responsibility between the centre and subsidiaries. Authority moves between centre and subsidiaries on the basis of a continuing dialogue about which party is best suited to make particular decisions.
This means - for example - that the total cumulative cash flows from a two-year investment must be identical, whether the investment is built:


* '[[Outright]]' from a two-year zero coupon investment
* Or as a [[synthetic]] deposit built using a forward contract, reinvesting intermediate principal and interest proceeds at a pre-agreed rate
* Or using a par investment, reinvesting intermediate interest to generate a total terminal cash flow


2.  ''Other organisations and structures.''


Having authority, activity, control or resources located in relatively fewer places, or a single place.
<span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 1: Converting two-period zero coupon yields to forward yields'''</span>
 
Periodic zero coupon yields ('''z''') are:
 
z<sub>0-1</sub> = 0.02 per period (2%)
 
z<sub>0-2</sub> = 0.029951 per period (2.9951%)
 
 
The cash returned at Time 2 periods in the future, from investing £1m at Time 0 in a zero coupon instrument at a rate of 2.9951% per period, is:
 
£1m x 1.029951<sup>2</sup>
 
= £'''1.0608m'''
 
 
Under no-arbitrage pricing conditions, the identical terminal cash flow of £1.0608m results from investing in an outright zero coupon investment of one periods maturity, together with a forward contract for the second period - for reinvestment at the forward market yield of '''f<sub>1-2</sub>''' per period, as follows:
 
£1m x (1 + z<sub>0-1</sub>) x (1 + f<sub>1-2</sub>) = £'''1.0608m'''
 
 
Using this information, we can now calculate the forward yield for 1-2 periods' maturity.
 
1.02 x (1 + f<sub>1-2</sub>) = 1.0608
 
1 + f<sub>1-2</sub> = 1.0608 / 1.02
 
f<sub>1-2</sub> = (1.0608 / 1.02) - 1
 
= 1.04 - 1
 
= '''0.04''' per period (= 4%)
 
 
This is the market forward rate which we would enjoy if we were to pre-agree today, to make a one-period deposit, committing ourselves to put our money into the deposit one period in the future.
 
 
The no-arbitrage relationship says that making such a synthetic deposit should produce the identical terminal cash flow of £1.0608m. Let's see if that's borne out by our calculations.
 
 
Investing the same £1m in this synthetic two-periods maturity zero coupon instrument would return:
 
After one period: £1m x 1.02 = £1.02m
 
Reinvested for the second period at the pre-agreed rate of 0.04 per period for one more period:
 
= £1.02m x 1.04
 
= £'''1.0608m'''
 
 
''This is the same result as enjoyed from the outright zero coupon investment, as expected.
 




== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[Central account]]
* [[Zero coupon yield]]
*[[Central bank]]
* [[Bootstrap]]
*[[Central clearing]]
* [[Forward yield]]
*[[Central counterparty]]
* [[Par yield]]
*[[Central Limit Order Book]]
* [[Coupon]]
*[[Decentralised]]
* [[Spot rate]]
*[[In-house bank]]
* [[Yield curve]]
*[[Profit centre]]
* [[Zero]]
*[[Regional Treasury Centre]]
* [[Zero coupon bond]]
* [[Treasury organisation]]
* [[Flat yield curve]]
 
* [[Rising yield curve]]
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
* [[Falling yield curve]]
[[Category:The_business_context]]
* [[Positive yield curve]]
[[Category:Corporate_finance]]
* [[Negative yield curve]]
[[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]]
[[Category:Manage_risks]]
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]
[[Category:Risk_reporting]]
[[Category:Financial_products_and_markets]]
[[Category:Treasury_operations_infrastructure]]

Revision as of 08:21, 15 November 2015

The zero coupon rate is also known as the zero coupon yield, spot rate, or spot yield.


Conversion

If we know the zero coupon rates (yield curve) for a given risk class and set of maturities, we can calculate both the forward yields and the par yields for the same maturities and risk class.


The conversion process and calculation stems from the 'no-arbitrage' relationship between the related yield curves.

This means - for example - that the total cumulative cash flows from a two-year investment must be identical, whether the investment is built:

  • 'Outright' from a two-year zero coupon investment
  • Or as a synthetic deposit built using a forward contract, reinvesting intermediate principal and interest proceeds at a pre-agreed rate
  • Or using a par investment, reinvesting intermediate interest to generate a total terminal cash flow


Example 1: Converting two-period zero coupon yields to forward yields

Periodic zero coupon yields (z) are:

z0-1 = 0.02 per period (2%)

z0-2 = 0.029951 per period (2.9951%)


The cash returned at Time 2 periods in the future, from investing £1m at Time 0 in a zero coupon instrument at a rate of 2.9951% per period, is:

£1m x 1.0299512

= £1.0608m


Under no-arbitrage pricing conditions, the identical terminal cash flow of £1.0608m results from investing in an outright zero coupon investment of one periods maturity, together with a forward contract for the second period - for reinvestment at the forward market yield of f1-2 per period, as follows:

£1m x (1 + z0-1) x (1 + f1-2) = £1.0608m


Using this information, we can now calculate the forward yield for 1-2 periods' maturity.

1.02 x (1 + f1-2) = 1.0608

1 + f1-2 = 1.0608 / 1.02

f1-2 = (1.0608 / 1.02) - 1

= 1.04 - 1

= 0.04 per period (= 4%)


This is the market forward rate which we would enjoy if we were to pre-agree today, to make a one-period deposit, committing ourselves to put our money into the deposit one period in the future.


The no-arbitrage relationship says that making such a synthetic deposit should produce the identical terminal cash flow of £1.0608m. Let's see if that's borne out by our calculations.


Investing the same £1m in this synthetic two-periods maturity zero coupon instrument would return:

After one period: £1m x 1.02 = £1.02m

Reinvested for the second period at the pre-agreed rate of 0.04 per period for one more period:

= £1.02m x 1.04

= £1.0608m


This is the same result as enjoyed from the outright zero coupon investment, as expected.


See also