Internal rate of return: Difference between revisions
imported>Doug Williamson m (Add link to PV page. Note qualification to needing to iterate "unless the pattern of cash flows is very simple...") |
imported>Doug Williamson m (Link with qualifications page.) |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[CertFMM]] | |||
* [[Effective interest rate]] | * [[Effective interest rate]] | ||
* [[Hurdle rate]] | * [[Hurdle rate]] | ||
Revision as of 14:45, 1 November 2014
(IRR).
Definition of IRR
The internal rate of return of a set of cash flows is the cost of capital which, when applied to discount all of the cash flows (including any initial investment flow at Time 0) results in a Net Present Value (NPV) of NIL.
For an investor, the IRR of an investment proposal therefore represents their expected rate of return on their investment in the project.
Example
For example, a project requires an investment today of $100m, with $110m being receivable one year from now.
The IRR of this project is 10%, because that is the cost of capital which results in an NPV of $0, as follows:
PV of Time 0 outflow $100m = $(100m)
PV of Time 1 inflow $110m = $110m x 1.1-1 = $100m
NPV = -$100m + $100m
= $0.
Determining IRR
Unless the pattern of cash flows is very simple, it is normally only possible to determine IRR by trial and error (iterative) methods.
Example
For example, using straight line interpolation and the following data:
First estimated rate of return 5%, positive NPV = $+4m; and
Second estimated rate of return 6%, negative NPV = $-4m.
The straight-line-interpolated estimated IRR is the mid-point between 5% and 6%.
This is 5.5%.
Using iteration, the straight-line estimation process could then be repeated, using the value of 5.5% to recalculate the NPV, and so on.
The IRR function in Excel uses a similar trial and error method.
IRR project analysis decision rule
In simple IRR project analysis the decision rule would be that:
(1) All opportunities with above the required IRR should be accepted.
(2) All other opportunities should be rejected.
However this assumes the unlimited availability of further capital with no increase in the cost of capital.
A more refined decision rule is that:
(1) All opportunities with IRRs BELOW the required IRR should still be REJECTED; while
(2) All other opportunities remain eligible for further consideration (rather than automatically being accepted).
