Lognormally distributed share returns: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Administrator
(CSV import)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Spacing 22/8/13)
Line 3: Line 3:
Normal distributions have infinitely long ‘tails’ both upside and downside - so implying unlimited downside potential when used for modelling share returns.  
Normal distributions have infinitely long ‘tails’ both upside and downside - so implying unlimited downside potential when used for modelling share returns.  


But the theoretically worst outcome for a share investor is to lose the whole of their investment - in other words a negative return of -100%. It is not theoretically possible to suffer a return of worse than -100%.
But the theoretically worst outcome for a share investor is to lose the whole of their investment - in other words a negative return of -100%.  
 
It is not theoretically possible to suffer a return of worse than -100%.


Lognormal distributions - unlike normal distributions - also have a limited downside, so they do not suffer from this theoretical shortcoming.
Lognormal distributions - unlike normal distributions - also have a limited downside, so they do not suffer from this theoretical shortcoming.


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 11: Line 14:
* [[Normal distribution]]
* [[Normal distribution]]
* [[Volatility]]
* [[Volatility]]

Revision as of 10:56, 22 August 2013

If share returns are lognormally distributed it means that the logarithm of [1 + the share return] has a normal probability distribution.

Normal distributions have infinitely long ‘tails’ both upside and downside - so implying unlimited downside potential when used for modelling share returns.

But the theoretically worst outcome for a share investor is to lose the whole of their investment - in other words a negative return of -100%.

It is not theoretically possible to suffer a return of worse than -100%.

Lognormal distributions - unlike normal distributions - also have a limited downside, so they do not suffer from this theoretical shortcoming.


See also