OFC and Structural subordination: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create the page. Source: Bank of England Explanatory Notes about M4, accessed 31 Aug 2015: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/statistics/Pages/iadb/notesiadb/m4_sectoral.aspx)
 
imported>Administrator
(CSV import)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Other Financial Corporation, as defined by the Bank of England.
''Risk management''.
An effective reduction in the ranking of the claim of a lender or other creditor resulting from a combination of:
(1) The ownership structure of the borrower, for example in a group of companies; and
(2) Holding a claim against the 'wrong' legal entity.


For example, the claims of the creditors of a holding company may become structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of the subsidiary companies in the same group.  This is because the claim of the holding company itself - as a shareholder of the subsidiary - is generally subordinated to the claims of the other creditors of the subsidiary.
This can be particularly problematic where the subsidiary is in a different country from the holding company, where local legal and other claims may effectively erode the position of the holding company's creditors.


== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[Monetary financial institution]]
* [[Subordination]]
*[[Central bank]]
*[[PNFC]]
 
*[[NFC]]
*[[Bank of England]]

Revision as of 14:20, 23 October 2012

Risk management. An effective reduction in the ranking of the claim of a lender or other creditor resulting from a combination of: (1) The ownership structure of the borrower, for example in a group of companies; and (2) Holding a claim against the 'wrong' legal entity.

For example, the claims of the creditors of a holding company may become structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of the subsidiary companies in the same group. This is because the claim of the holding company itself - as a shareholder of the subsidiary - is generally subordinated to the claims of the other creditors of the subsidiary.

This can be particularly problematic where the subsidiary is in a different country from the holding company, where local legal and other claims may effectively erode the position of the holding company's creditors.

See also