Off balance sheet finance and Structural subordination: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Remove surplus link.)
 
imported>Administrator
(CSV import)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Any form of finance that does not result in a finance liability appearing on a published balance sheet.
''Risk management''.
An effective reduction in the ranking of the claim of a lender or other creditor resulting from a combination of:
(1) The ownership structure of the borrower, for example in a group of companies; and
(2) Holding a claim against the 'wrong' legal entity.


On double entry bookkeeping principles, the asset being financed cannot appear either.
For example, the claims of the creditors of a holding company may become structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of the subsidiary companies in the same group.  This is because the claim of the holding company itself - as a shareholder of the subsidiary - is generally subordinated to the claims of the other creditors of the subsidiary.


This can be particularly problematic where the subsidiary is in a different country from the holding company, where local legal and other claims may effectively erode the position of the holding company's creditors.


The effect of such financing and accounting methods is to show the entity's borrowings - and financial risk - at a lower level than they really are.
== See also ==
* [[Subordination]]


==See also==
* [[Balance sheet]]
* [[Double entry]]
* [[Finance lease]]
* [[Gearing]]
* [[IFRS 16]]
* [[Liabilities]]
* [[Off balance sheet]]
* [[Securitisation]]
* [[Securitisation special purpose vehicle]]
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]

Revision as of 14:20, 23 October 2012

Risk management. An effective reduction in the ranking of the claim of a lender or other creditor resulting from a combination of: (1) The ownership structure of the borrower, for example in a group of companies; and (2) Holding a claim against the 'wrong' legal entity.

For example, the claims of the creditors of a holding company may become structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of the subsidiary companies in the same group. This is because the claim of the holding company itself - as a shareholder of the subsidiary - is generally subordinated to the claims of the other creditors of the subsidiary.

This can be particularly problematic where the subsidiary is in a different country from the holding company, where local legal and other claims may effectively erode the position of the holding company's creditors.

See also