(Difference between pages)
imported>Doug Williamson |
imported>Doug Williamson |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| 1. ''Contract law.''
| | ''Capital adequacy''. |
|
| |
|
| A required element in a contract under English law by which something of value, including a promise, is exchanged for the act or promise of another.
| | Reserve Requirement Ratio. |
| | |
| Note that other legal systems may differ significantly. For example in Scots law a unilateral undertaking that is intended to have legal effect, such as a promise, is binding without consideration passing from the recipient of that promise.
| |
| | |
| | |
| 2.
| |
| | |
| More generally, thoughtfulness and sensitivity towards others.
| |
| | |
| | |
| 3.
| |
| | |
| To act with courtesy and consideration is one of the principles of the ACT's Ethical Code.
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| == See also == | | == See also == |
| * [[ACT Competency Framework]] | | * [[Capital adequacy]] |
| * [[ACT Ethical Code]] | | * [[Reserve requirements]] |
| * [[Consensus in idem]] | | * [[Reserves]] |
| * [[Contract]]
| |
| * [[Courtesy]]
| |
| * [[Quid pro quo]]
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Compliance_and_audit]]
| |
| [[Category:Ethics]]
| |
| [[Category:Treasury_operations_infrastructure]]
| |
Revision as of 12:47, 20 July 2016
Capital adequacy.
Reserve Requirement Ratio.
See also
