Public goods: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Add second definition.)
imported>Doug Williamson
(Layout.)
Line 8: Line 8:




Non-rivalry means that when a public good is enjoyed, it doesn’t reduce the amount available for other people.
'''Non-rivalry''' means that when a public good is enjoyed, it doesn’t reduce the amount available for other people.


Non-excludability means that it is not possible both to provide such a good and prevent others enjoying it. For this reason, 'pure' public goods are more likely to be efficiently provided by the public sector, rather than by the private sector.
'''Non-excludability''' means that it is not possible both to provide such a good and prevent others enjoying it. For this reason, 'pure' public goods are more likely to be efficiently provided by the public sector, rather than by the private sector.





Revision as of 21:56, 6 November 2020

Economics.

1.

Examples of 'pure' public goods include flood control, street lighting, policing and national defence.

The definition of public goods includes non-rivalry and non-excludability.


Non-rivalry means that when a public good is enjoyed, it doesn’t reduce the amount available for other people.

Non-excludability means that it is not possible both to provide such a good and prevent others enjoying it. For this reason, 'pure' public goods are more likely to be efficiently provided by the public sector, rather than by the private sector.


2.

By extension, 'public goods' may also refer to any services which - its proponents argue - should be provided by the public sector, whether or not they are 'pure' public goods in the sense defined above.

Examples include health and education services.


See also