Dual reporting: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Amended as advised by Stephen Baseby, associate policy and technical director ACT, 11 September 2015.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Mend EMIR reference and link.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The prevailing system of reporting under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:201:0001:0059:EN:PDF (EMIR), under which both parties to a transaction are required to report it. | The prevailing system of reporting under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation<ref> http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:201:0001:0059:EN:PDF</ref> (EMIR), under which both parties to a transaction are required to report it. | ||
Sometimes known as 'DSR' (Dual-Sided Reporting). | Sometimes known as 'DSR' (Dual-Sided Reporting). | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
=== Other links === | === Other links === | ||
[https://www.treasurers.org/ACTmedia/EMIR_Consulation_Response_August_2015.pdf ACT's EMIR Consultation Response, August 2015] | [https://www.treasurers.org/ACTmedia/EMIR_Consulation_Response_August_2015.pdf ACT's EMIR Consultation Response, August 2015] | ||
==References== | |||
<references /> | |||
Revision as of 09:42, 12 September 2015
The prevailing system of reporting under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation[1] (EMIR), under which both parties to a transaction are required to report it.
Sometimes known as 'DSR' (Dual-Sided Reporting).
The Association of Corporate Treasurers and others are lobbying for a system of single-sided reporting (SSR) of transactions between financial counterparties (FCs) and non-financial counterparties (NFCs), under which only the financial counterparty would be required to report the trade.
See also
Other links
ACT's EMIR Consultation Response, August 2015
